Article filling the regional gap in knowledge of diet composition of the barn owl (Tyto alba) and the long-eared owl (Asio otus). The study was conducted at the Lewisville Lake Environmental Learning Area (LLELA) and examined the remains found in owl pellets collected September 2016 to March 2017.
The College of Science provides students with the high-demand skills and knowledge to succeed as researchers and professionals. The College includes four departments: Biology, Chemistry, Math, and Physics, and is also home to a number of interdisciplinary programs, centers, institutes, intercollegiate programs, labs, and services.
Article filling the regional gap in knowledge of diet composition of the barn owl (Tyto alba) and the long-eared owl (Asio otus). The study was conducted at the Lewisville Lake Environmental Learning Area (LLELA) and examined the remains found in owl pellets collected September 2016 to March 2017.
Physical Description
16 p.
Notes
Abstract: Predator-prey interactions often define the coexistence of species in space and time. In this research, we are filling a regional gap in knowledge of diet composition of the barn owl (Tyto alba) and the long-eared owl (Asio otus). The study was conducted at the Lewisville Lake Environmental Learning Area (LLELA), a patch of tallgrass prairie and post oak forest surrounded by areas with large anthropogenic modifications in north-central Texas. We examined the remains found in owl pellets collected September 2016 to March 2017. Small mammals, mainly rodents, constituted 100% of the T. alba and 98.5% of the A. otus diet. The hispid cotton rat (Sigmodon hispidus) was the most common prey detected (68.2% for T. alba and 89.0% for A. otus). Diet niche breadth of T. alba was broader than that of A. otus (0.47 and 0.06, respectively), whereas mean prey size was smaller in the T. alba diet. Diet overlap between these owls was high (0.96), likely because they hunt similarly at night, on the wing, and the prey species have limited diversity. Most rodents eaten were juveniles and the sex ratio of prey was even in both owls’ diets. We highlight the value of conducting studies in such a unique and relatively pristine environment in the face of multiple threats. Additionally, although the occurrence of A. otus is rare and infrequent in the study area, we were still able to detect a difference in diet between the ubiquitous T. alba and A. otus.
Preferred Citation:
Jiménez, J.E., M.K. Jones, K. Stoddart, S. Dickson, A. Chapman, J.L. Baxter-Slye & K.L. Steigman. 2020. Comparative diet analysis of Barn Owl (Tyto alba) and Long-eared Owl (Asio otus) in a habitat island in north-central Texas. Texas J. Sci. 72: Article 5. https://doi.org/10.32011/txjsci_72_1_Article5
Collections
This article is part of the following collection of related materials.
UNT Scholarly Works
Materials from the UNT community's research, creative, and scholarly activities and UNT's Open Access Repository. Access to some items in this collection may be restricted.
Jiménez, Jaime E.; Jones, Matthew K.; Stoddart, Kaitlyn; Dickson, Sentell; Chapman, Abigail; Baxter-Slye, Jaime L. et al.Comparative Diet Analysis of Barn Owl (Tyto alba) and Long- Eared Owl (Asio otus) in a Habitat Island in North-Central Texas,
article,
August 22, 2020;
(https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc1934142/:
accessed June 11, 2024),
University of North Texas Libraries, UNT Digital Library, https://digital.library.unt.edu;
crediting UNT College of Science.
