The UNT College of Arts and Sciences educates students in traditional liberal arts, performing arts, sciences, professional, and technical academic programs. In addition to its departments, the college includes academic centers, institutes, programs, and offices providing diverse courses of study.
This article suggests ways the field can recast the use of disaster phases to improve the theoretical and applied dimensions of the field.
Physical Description
26 p.
Notes
Abstract: The use of disaster phases (e.g., preparedness, response, recovery, and mitigation) has assisted both disaster researchers and managers. Disaster researchers have used disaster phases to systematize and codify research results. Disaster managers have drawn upon disaster periods to organize their own activities. Yet, many problems exist with the current use of disaster periods. In summary, i find that the current uses of disaster periods lack conceptual clarity for improving scientific and practical use. As a result, I suggest ways the field can recast the use of disaster phrases to improve the theoretical and applied dimensions of the field.
Publication Title:
International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters
Volume:
15
Issue:
2
Page Start:
239
Page End:
264
Peer Reviewed:
Yes
Collections
This article is part of the following collection of related materials.
UNT Scholarly Works
Materials from the UNT community's research, creative, and scholarly activities and UNT's Open Access Repository. Access to some items in this collection may be restricted.
