Dilute Oxygen Combustion Phase IV Final Report Metadata

Metadata describes a digital item, providing (if known) such information as creator, publisher, contents, size, relationship to other resources, and more. Metadata may also contain "preservation" components that help us to maintain the integrity of digital files over time.

Title

  • Main Title Dilute Oxygen Combustion Phase IV Final Report

Creator

  • Author: Riley, M.F.
    Creator Type: Personal

Contributor

  • Sponsor: United States. Department of Energy. Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.
    Contributor Type: Organization
    Contributor Info: USDOE - Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EE)

Publisher

  • Name: Praxair, Inc.
    Place of Publication: United States

Date

  • Creation: 2003-04-30

Language

  • English

Description

  • Content Description: Novel furnace designs based on Dilute Oxygen Combustion (DOC) technology were developed under subcontract by Techint Technologies, Coraopolis, PA, to fully exploit the energy and environmental capabilities of DOC technology and to provide a competitive offering for new furnace construction opportunities. Capital cost, fuel, oxygen and utility costs, NOx emissions, oxide scaling performance, and maintenance requirements were compared for five DOC-based designs and three conventional air5-fired designs using a 10-year net present value calculation. A furnace direct completely with DOC burners offers low capital cost, low fuel rate, and minimal NOx emissions. However, these benefits do not offset the cost of oxygen and a full DOC-fired furnace is projected to cost $1.30 per ton more to operate than a conventional air-fired furnace. The incremental cost of the improved NOx performance is roughly $6/lb NOx, compared with an estimated $3/lb. NOx for equ8pping a conventional furnace with selective catalytic reduction (SCCR) technology. A furnace fired with DOC burners in the heating zone and ambient temperature (cold) air-fired burners in the soak zone offers low capital cost with less oxygen consumption. However, the improvement in fuel rate is not as great as the full DOC-fired design, and the DOC-cold soak design is also projected to cost $1.30 per ton more to operate than a conventional air-fired furnace. The NOx improvement with the DOC-cold soak design is also not as great as the full DOC fired design, and the incremental cost of the improved NOx performance is nearly $9/lb NOx. These results indicate that a DOC-based furnace design will not be generally competitive with conventional technology for new furnace construction under current market conditions. Fuel prices of $7/MMBtu or oxygen prices of $23/ton are needed to make the DOC furnace economics favorable. Niche applications may exist, particularly where access to capital is limited or floor space limitations are critical. DOC technology will continue to have a highly competitive role in retrofit applications requiring increases in furnace productivity.
  • Physical Description: 2.1 Mbyte

Subject

  • Keyword: Capitalized Cost
  • Keyword: Furnaces
  • Keyword: Oxy-Fuel Combustion
  • Keyword: Oxides
  • Keyword: Construction
  • Keyword: Prices
  • Keyword: Heating
  • Keyword: Oxygen
  • Keyword: Economics
  • Keyword: Steel Reheat Furnace
  • Keyword: Oxy-Fuel Combustion
  • Keyword: Burners
  • Keyword: Low Nox
  • STI Subject Categories: 03 Natural Gas
  • Keyword: Market
  • Keyword: Combustion
  • Keyword: Productivity
  • Keyword: Dilute Oxygen Combustion
  • Keyword: Ambient Temperature
  • Keyword: Doc Burner
  • Keyword: Dilute Oxygen
  • STI Subject Categories: 32 Energy Conservation, Consumption, And Utilization
  • Keyword: Maintenance
  • Keyword: Capital
  • Keyword: Selective Catalytic Reduction Steel Reheat Furnace

Collection

  • Name: Office of Scientific & Technical Information Technical Reports
    Code: OSTI

Institution

  • Name: UNT Libraries Government Documents Department
    Code: UNTGD

Resource Type

  • Report

Format

  • Text

Identifier

  • Report No.: DOE/ID/13331-4
  • Grant Number: FC36-95ID13331
  • DOI: 10.2172/877124
  • Office of Scientific & Technical Information Report Number: 877124
  • Archival Resource Key: ark:/67531/metadc879938
Back to Top of Screen