1995 Army Team Lead Desk Material - Adds to List Hearing, May 21, 1993 Page: 9 of 222
This legal document is part of the collection entitled: Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission and was provided to UNT Digital Library by the UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.
- Highlighting
- Highlighting On/Off
- Color:
- Adjust Image
- Rotate Left
- Rotate Right
- Brightness, Contrast, etc. (Experimental)
- Cropping Tool
- Download Sizes
- Preview all sizes/dimensions or...
- Download Thumbnail
- Download Small
- Download Medium
- Download Large
- High Resolution Files
- IIIF Image JSON
- IIIF Image URL
- Accessibility
- View Extracted Text
Extracted Text
The following text was automatically extracted from the image on this page using optical character recognition software:
6
~V 1
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
~34
Ii 5
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
tv6CHAIRMAN COURTER: It will be
passed.
When it comes to military
facilities, we'll actually have a roll call
vote.
Do I hear a motion with
respect to the second technical amndment?
COMMISSIONER STUART: To
clarify the Commission's intent, I move that
the second sentence of Rule 6 of the
Procedural Rules of the Defense Base Closure
and Real i grment Commission be amended to read
"will be by a majority vote of the eligible
Commission mers serving at that time. The
votes of at least a majority of the eligible
Commission members serving at the time are
required to reject a recommendation of the
Secretary (to find the Secretary deviated
substantially in making the recommendation) or
to add a military installation to the
Secretary's list."
I make that motion, sir.
CHAIRMAN COURTER: Do I hear a
second to the motion?
COMMISSIONER BYRON: Second.
CHAIRMAN COURTER: It has been
moved and seconded. Any discussion on the
motion?
(No response.)
CHAIRMAN COURTER:
Hearing no request for discussion, all those
in favor, say Aye.
(Chorus of ayes.)
CHAIRMAN COURTER: ALl those
opposed?
(No response.)
CHAIRMAN COUR TER: Hearing
none, the motion is passed.
We will proceed, and I'll
recognize the chief of staff, Matt Behrman.
MR. BEHRMANN: Mr. Chairman,
just a very few words, and then we'll get
right down to business. I have been asked by
the staff Leaders to mention some of the
things that you talked about in terms of
responsibi l ity.
We have worked, as you know,
very closely with commnuniities over the last
few months. And I'm proud to work with the
people that you have helped to put together as
a staff. They recognize the responsibility
that they have and the impacts of your
decisions, and they're dedicated to providing
you the best information that we can get for
your consideration. And they asked me to say
that. There are some dedicated folks that are
helping you here today.
Secondly, the logistics of
c cting business here in this format make
it somewhat difficult. You alluded to sort of
how we have prepared briefing remarks for you.
We tried to anticipate some of the issues that
you would want to get into. We have tried to
provide you enough comparative level data to
make reasoned decisions about those bases that
warrant a further look.
We're prepared to go into
aditional information that's not in the
formal briefing, but the logistics ofconducting our work here away from our offices
does make it a little bit difficult, and we're
prepared to deviate from the formal briefings
at any time that you want us to do so.
Those are the only commnts
that I have. I guess we can move right into
Ed Brown and the Army team briefing.
CHAIRMAN COURTER: Mr. Brown,
you're recognized. Why don't you give us that
overview?
MR. BROWJ: Thank you, Mr.
Chairman.
Mr. Chairman and
commissioners, I have with me today on mny
immediate Left John Graham; to his Left,
Lieutenant Colonel Brian Duffy; and to his
Left, Bud Bale. They will assist in answering
your questions.
Mark, put up chart 1-R,
please.
This chart shows the number of
categories into which the Army divided its
installations for consideration. The number
of installations represent those subjected to
military value assessments within each
category. Highlighted categories have
installations that one or more commissioner
has recommended as an alternative or addition
to a D00 recommendation.
I will not discuss depos.
They will be discussed by Bob Cook in his
interagency issues team. I will discuss the
other installations, in order that you may
vote whether to add them for future
consideration.
On chart 2-R and the
accompanying map, 2-L, are shown the Army's 11
maneuver bases. Chart 3-R shows the Army's
military value ranking of the maneuver bases
and their relative scores within the category.
Fort Hood, Fort Bragg, and Fort Lewis scored
in the 6 to 7 range out of a high score of 10;
Fort Stewart, Carson, Campbell, Wainwright,
and Riley are in the 4 to S range; Fort Orum,
Schofield Barracks, and Fort Richardson are
the Lowest ranking bases.
Chart 4- provides some detail
about maneuver installations. Forts Bragg,
Hood, and Lewis each have a corps
headquarters. With the exception of Fort
Lewis, ashington; Fort Richardson, Alaska;
and Fort Wainwright, Alaska, each one houses
at least I of the 12 active component
divisions in the force structure plan.
Only Forts Carson, Hood,
Lewis, Riley, and Stewart have adequate
facilities and training areas to support
armored and mechanized divisions. Fort Lewis
is the only installation that can house either
a light or hear' division, but that does not
mean that i t has, fac ili t ies to house two
divisions. Facilities in training areas on
the other installartions are suitable for light
divisions only.
The mi li tary strength coluan
shows the nasber" of soldiers assigned to the
base and the nster of those that are assigned
to the division on that base. The buildable
Upcoming Pages
Here’s what’s next.
Search Inside
This document can be searched. Note: Results may vary based on the legibility of text within the document.
Matching Search Results
View 10 places within this document that match your search.Tools / Downloads
Get a copy of this page or view the extracted text.
Citing and Sharing
Basic information for referencing this web page. We also provide extended guidance on usage rights, references, copying or embedding.
Reference the current page of this Legal Document.
United States. Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission. 1995 Army Team Lead Desk Material - Adds to List Hearing, May 21, 1993, legal document, February 17, 2006; (https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc25520/m1/9/?q=food+rule+for+unt+students: accessed July 18, 2024), University of North Texas Libraries, UNT Digital Library, https://digital.library.unt.edu; crediting UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.