1995 Army Team Lead Desk Material - Adds to List Hearing, May 21, 1993 Page: 89 of 222
This legal document is part of the collection entitled: Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission and was provided to UNT Digital Library by the UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.
- Highlighting
- Highlighting On/Off
- Color:
- Adjust Image
- Rotate Left
- Rotate Right
- Brightness, Contrast, etc. (Experimental)
- Cropping Tool
- Download Sizes
- Preview all sizes/dimensions or...
- Download Thumbnail
- Download Small
- Download Medium
- Download Large
- High Resolution Files
- IIIF Image JSON
- IIIF Image URL
- Accessibility
- View Extracted Text
Extracted Text
The following text was automatically extracted from the image on this page using optical character recognition software:
PageSaver
DEFENSE BASE CLOSURE COMMISSION- OPEN MEETING:Friday, May 21, 19932
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
1618 Chart 6-L reflects those large aircraft bases
19 rated by the Air Force as tanker or airlift bases that did
20 not compete for the East Coast mobility base. Again, the
21 highlighted bases are those brought up by the Commission for
22 discussion today.Page 710 of 880 Pages
1 Go to slide 7-L and 7-R.
2 On chart 7-L, your consideration is to study
3 Malmstrom, Beale, and McChord for closure or realignment as
4 an alternative to realigning March Air Force Base, as
5 recommended by the Secretary of Defense.
6 In the Air Force grouping row on the chart on your
. left and as shown on your right on 7-R -- if you could put
B7-R up, now. Thank you.MS. CHESTON: On the motion that the Commission
consider Plattsburgh Air Force Base, New York, as a proposed
addition to the Secretary's list of military installations
recommended for closure or realignment, the vote is seven in
favor, zero against; the motion passes.
CHAIRMAN COURTER: Is there any other motions with
respect to large aircraft? Is that large aircraft bases on
the coast?
MR. CIRILLO: We're actually going to look at
large aircraft, because of the way they rack and stack them
in three different capacities here today, Mr. Chairman.
CHAIRMAN COURTER: Why don't we proceed, then. Go
ahead.
MR. CIRILLO: Yes, sir, Mr. Chairman.
If you could go to slide 6-L. And I believe we're
going to put 5-L up again to see the whole large aircraft
picture.9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22Page 711 of 880 Pages
1 In other words, these are sending the assets from that base
2 from a complete closure to a Base X.
3 The only case that will have an actual closure
4 cost for recommendation is in that instance, such as March
5 Air Force Base, where you do see an actual cost applied for
6 the recommended COBRA cost, in this case, a $257 million
7 level run COBRA cost, and the $135 million cost to actually
8 realign March Air Force Base.
9 COMMISSIONER STUART: Frank, how do we get a look
10 at these in relation to K.I. Sawyer?
11 MR. CIRILLO: Sir, K.I. Sawyer was rated in the
12 bomber category. It was not rated as an airlift
13 installation. We do have a comparison later on that we
14 could bring up, and it will show you how it rates against
15 other bomber installations. We could actually bring that
16 slide up earlier, if you wish, but you'll have a chance toDiversified Reporting Services, Inc. - (202) 296-2929
You can see the Air Force groupings. In this
case, for airlift, bomber, and tanker mission areas, again,
group 1 was the Air Force group most desirable to retain,
and the bases within each group are listed alphabetically,
not in any rank order. In this instance, we again show the
preliminary staff operational score for military value
criteria 1 through 3.
I call your attention to the issues down in the
left-hand chart, as well as the operational scores we just
discussed. We point out areas of unique military value on
each of the installations. In all of the charts, we show a
one-time closure cost down near the bottom. And, as a point
of information that you'll see throughout the charts, all
the closure costs that are shown are level run COBRA costs.PAnQ 1q7 n 9(1 Q
Upcoming Pages
Here’s what’s next.
Search Inside
This document can be searched. Note: Results may vary based on the legibility of text within the document.
Matching Search Results
View 10 places within this document that match your search.Tools / Downloads
Get a copy of this page or view the extracted text.
Citing and Sharing
Basic information for referencing this web page. We also provide extended guidance on usage rights, references, copying or embedding.
Reference the current page of this Legal Document.
United States. Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission. 1995 Army Team Lead Desk Material - Adds to List Hearing, May 21, 1993, legal document, February 17, 2006; (https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc25520/m1/89/?q=food+rule+for+unt+students: accessed July 18, 2024), University of North Texas Libraries, UNT Digital Library, https://digital.library.unt.edu; crediting UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.