1995 Army Team Lead Desk Material - Adds to List Hearing, May 21, 1993 Page: 63 of 222
This legal document is part of the collection entitled: Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission and was provided to UNT Digital Library by the UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.
- Highlighting
- Highlighting On/Off
- Color:
- Adjust Image
- Rotate Left
- Rotate Right
- Brightness, Contrast, etc. (Experimental)
- Cropping Tool
- Download Sizes
- Preview all sizes/dimensions or...
- Download Thumbnail
- Download Small
- Download Medium
- Download Large
- High Resolution Files
- IIIF Image JSON
- IIIF Image URL
- Accessibility
- View Extracted Text
Extracted Text
The following text was automatically extracted from the image on this page using optical character recognition software:
60
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
W35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
W 67
~68
69must now take by way of votes or accorded
votes on this category?
MS. CHESTON: No, there's not.
On the three Naval training centers?
MR. YELLIN: Well, there is a
scenario presented by the community from
Orlando, and it relates to -- the scenario for
the closure of Orlando says that there are
schools moved from Orlando to Naval Subbese
Maw London.
CHAIRMAN COURTER: That's
correct.
MR. YELLIN: We have received
a scenario that reverses that, or, in fact,
could possibly take those schools fromN ew
London to some other Location.
CHAIRMAN COURTER: We'Ll hear
you out. But the point is that we don't need
additional motions with regard to Great Lakes.
MR. YELLIN: Oh, no.
CHAIRMAN COURTER: But we may
with regard to New London.
MR. YELLIN: Excuse me. I
didn't mean to interrupt you on that. Yes,
sir.
CHAIRMAN COURTER: Well, why
don't you give us a quick overview?
MR. YELLIN: If you would xt
up 28 and 29.
I'm going to introduce Bill
Berl, on my left. He is the analyst for the
Naval training category. And on 28 we have a
map showing a summary of the recommendations
of the Defense Department related to the
training category. And on 29 we have a
sumery of the consideration --
COMMISSIONER BYRON: Mr.
Chairmen?
CHAIRMAN COURTER: Yes.
CMISSIONER SYRON: Excuse me
for interrupting, but I just interpreted what
I heard earlier, that nothing else needs to be
done on the training center. 1 now understand
from counsel that something needs to be
mentioned about the Naval hospital at Great
Lakes. There does need to be a motion in
regard to that.
Would it be proper to do that
now or wait until we finish this segment?
CHAIRMAN COURTER: Whatever
you want to do is okay with me. You want to
make that motion now?
COMMISSIONER BYRON: Yes.
COMMISSIONER STUART: Before
Beverly makes that, I would just like to go on
record, once again, that I'm recusing myself
from anything involved in that Naval training
center at Great Lakes or Orlando or San Diego.
CHAIRMAN COURTER: Gentlelady
is recognized for a motion.
COMMISSIOER BYRON: I move
that the Commission consider the Naval
hospital at Great Lakes, Illinois, as a
proposed addi t ion to the Secretary' s i st of
military installations recomene for closure
or real igruaent.
CHAIRMfAN CCOJRTER: Do I hear a
second on the mot ion?
COMMISSIlONER MCPHERSON:Second.
CHAIRMAN COURTER: Any
discussion on the motion?
(No response.)
CHAIRMAN COURTER: I'll start
out with Commissioner Peter Bomaen.
COMMISSIONER BGIAN: Aye.
COMMISSIONER CON: Aye.
COMMISSIONER MCPHERSON: Aye.
CHAIRMAN COURTER: Aye.
GEM JOHNSON: Aye.
COMM I SS I ONER BYRON: Aye.
CHAIRMAN COURTER: Counsel?
MS. CHESTON: On the motion
that the Commission consider the Naval
hospital Great Lakes, Illinois, as a proposed
addition to the Secretary's list of military
installations recommended for closure or
reaL igrment, the vote is six in favor, zero
against; the nation passes.
CHAIRMAN COURTER: Alex, you
can continue.
MR. YELLIN: Yes, sir. Thank
you. I would Like Bill to discuss real
briefly the portions of the overall training
scenario that affect the discussion about New
London.
MR. BERL: Real quickly, the
proposed DOD recommendation is to close the
Naval training centers at San Diego and
Orlando, move the majority of the training
requirements up to Great Lakes, at Orlando to
move the nuclear power school, the nuclear
power A school up to New London, Connecticut.
New London, Connecticut, is to be realigned,
as was mentioned earlier, the nuclear
submarines that are going to Kings Bay,
Norfolk.
And so, essentially, the
operational mission at Mew London is going to
be eliminated, and it's going to become, in
essence, a training center. The proposal also
-- or the DOD recommendation is to maintain
the piers and the infrastructure at New
Landon. What the community of Orlando has
recamerded is that, since the mission at New
London is going to change, and it's now
essentially a training center, that it be
Looked at in that light. And they have run
alternative scenarios, which are shown on
slide 29.
And I don't want to talk about
all the issues there, but just a couple of
them. The one near the bottom is the arnial
savings. That i s an Orlando number. It's for
a scenario which closes Great Lakes and New
London. And they are projecting an ainnal
savings of $173 million, which is about two
and-a-half times what the DOD recommendation
is.
MR. YELLIN: But the issue
here is, because New Lono is already on the
list as a potential real ignent, the issue
here is whether the commissioners want to
consider this scenario that we have just
presented, which would require or would ake
as a useful option the consideration of Naval
Sttbase New London as a closure, because if
the suts are actually moved as the real igreent
Upcoming Pages
Here’s what’s next.
Search Inside
This document can be searched. Note: Results may vary based on the legibility of text within the document.
Matching Search Results
View 10 places within this document that match your search.Tools / Downloads
Get a copy of this page or view the extracted text.
Citing and Sharing
Basic information for referencing this web page. We also provide extended guidance on usage rights, references, copying or embedding.
Reference the current page of this Legal Document.
United States. Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission. 1995 Army Team Lead Desk Material - Adds to List Hearing, May 21, 1993, legal document, February 17, 2006; (https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc25520/m1/63/?q=food+rule+for+unt+students: accessed July 18, 2024), University of North Texas Libraries, UNT Digital Library, https://digital.library.unt.edu; crediting UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.