1995 Army Team Lead Desk Material - Adds to List Hearing, May 21, 1993 Page: 50 of 222
This legal document is part of the collection entitled: Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission and was provided to UNT Digital Library by the UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.
- Highlighting
- Highlighting On/Off
- Color:
- Adjust Image
- Rotate Left
- Rotate Right
- Brightness, Contrast, etc. (Experimental)
- Cropping Tool
- Download Sizes
- Preview all sizes/dimensions or...
- Download Thumbnail
- Download Small
- Download Medium
- Download Large
- High Resolution Files
- IIIF Image JSON
- IIIF Image URL
- Accessibility
- View Extracted Text
Extracted Text
The following text was automatically extracted from the image on this page using optical character recognition software:
47
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69Latter.
Thank you.CO I[SSIOER BYRON: Okay.
CHAIRMAN COURTER: Any further
discussion on the motion?
(No response.)
CHAIRMAN COURTER:
Commissioner Peter Bowman.
COMMISSIONER BOGMAN: Aye.
COMMISSIONER MCPHERSON: Aye.
CHAIRMAN COURTER: Aye.
GEM JOHNSON: Aye.
COMMISSIONER BYRON: No.
COMMISSIONER STUART: Aye.know whether it mentioned it.
MR. YELLIN: It was included
as a redirect, because the receiving Location
was being changed. The receiving Location for
its helicopters was being changed from
Pendleton and Twentynine PaLms to Pendleton
wni Wirer.
C]ISSIONER BYRON: So it was
mntioned in the base closing this year for
the specific purpose of redirecting the
aircraft from a facility that was closed? It
was not mentioned at all to be reopened?
MR. BEHRMAMN: Ms. Byron, not
from a facility that was closed. The '91
proposal would have the assets go to either --
COMISSIONER BYRON: I
understand that. Twentynine Palm and
Pendleton, I think it was.
CHAIRMAN COURTER: You're
absolutely correct. You smmarized it
correctly, and I guess my point and other
commissioners' points was the reason -- it's
kind of unique circumstances. The reason that
we're entertaining the motion and the motion
was made and seconded was that the 1991
Commission, when it voted to close Tustin
pursuant to the recommendation, it balked at
the MILCON expenses of $600 million, as you
know, and those MILCON was supposed to be
spent at Twentynine Palms, pursuant to the
Navy's recommendat i on. And the Commission --
COMMISSIONER BYRON: I guess
what I'm trying to get at is, is Mr. Baan's
motion just to deal with the realignment of
the '91 Commission, or is it more in-depth?
CHAIRMAN COURTER: No. The
motion would permit that this particular
facility, Tustin, be continued to be used as a
Marine Corps facility.
COISSIONER BOMAN: I think
you're balking at the semantics.
COMISSIONER BYRON: Well, 1'm
trying to read your motion, when it says the
Secretary's list of military installations
recommended for realignment. Now, if the
motion is predicated on the fact that the
realignment in the '91 BRAC process was to go
to Twentynine Palms and Pendleton. And in the
'93 MAC process, the real igrmen t is now awed
to Pendleton and, I think, Wiramar, if I'm not
mistaken. Your motion is to once again retook
at the assets at Tustin to go somewhere else,
or retook at the assets at Tustin to stay
open?
O hI SSIONER SAN: Theplease.
Keep the map up and put up 19
The proposal here for
consideration is Naval Air Station Whiting,
Naval Air Station Kingsville, and Naval Air
Station Corpus Christi as alternatives to the
closure of Naval Air Station Meridian for the
purposes of reducing the excess capacity in
the air training category.
Rich, I would like you to --
LTC RICHARDELLA: Mark, would
you put up slide 10 on the left, please?
Thank you.The bottom half of slide 10
reflects the DOD recomendation to close
Meridian and mwve its advanced strike training
squadrons to Kingsvilte and to move its
intermediate strike training squadrons and the
Naval technicall training center to NAS
Pensacola.
With respect to slide 19 on
the right, you see military value reflected on
the top. And again, where the communi ty has
disagreed with the value assigned by the Navy,
we have reflected that in parentheses. In
this case, because it was a significant
deviation, the community in Meridian
recomp ted the mi i tary value nurtbers to
reflect a reassessment of the air space that
is used by the airplanes at Meridian.
Meridian was marked down by
the .avy or was assigned a lower military
value because of its distance from overwater
or offshore air space called %warning areas."
The community pointed out that they have been
training there for as long as they have been*WMS. CHESTON: Mr. Chairman,
I can just clarify the record on the Last two
motions. On the motion that the Commission
consider NAS Miramar, California, as a
proposed addition to the Secretary's List of
military installations recoelnded for closure
or realignment, the vote is six in favor and
zero against; the motion passes.
On the second motion that the
Commission consider MCAS Tustin, California,
as a proposed addition to the Secretary's list
of miLitary instaLations recomaended for
realigrment, the vote was six in favor, zero
against; the motion passes.
CWMISSIONER BYRON: I believe
I voted no.
MS. CHESTON: Excuse me.
CHAIRMAN COURTER: Mo. Five
to one.
MS. CHESTON: I stand
corrected. The vote was five in favor, one
against; the motion passes.
CHAIRMAN COURTER: We can move
to the next.
MR. YELLIN: Please put up 18
and go back and put up the mp on 9.
This is the training air
stations category. The Naval Air Station
Meridian, Mississippi, is on the DOD List as a
proposed closure, and we are currentLy
examining three other training air stations as
potential recommendations and potential
candidates.w
Upcoming Pages
Here’s what’s next.
Search Inside
This document can be searched. Note: Results may vary based on the legibility of text within the document.
Matching Search Results
View 10 places within this document that match your search.Tools / Downloads
Get a copy of this page or view the extracted text.
Citing and Sharing
Basic information for referencing this web page. We also provide extended guidance on usage rights, references, copying or embedding.
Reference the current page of this Legal Document.
United States. Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission. 1995 Army Team Lead Desk Material - Adds to List Hearing, May 21, 1993, legal document, February 17, 2006; (https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc25520/m1/50/?q=food+rule+for+unt+students: accessed July 18, 2024), University of North Texas Libraries, UNT Digital Library, https://digital.library.unt.edu; crediting UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.