1995 Army Team Lead Desk Material - Adds to List Hearing, May 21, 1993 Page: 46 of 222
This legal document is part of the collection entitled: Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission and was provided to UNT Digital Library by the UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.
- Highlighting
- Highlighting On/Off
- Color:
- Adjust Image
- Rotate Left
- Rotate Right
- Brightness, Contrast, etc. (Experimental)
- Cropping Tool
- Download Sizes
- Preview all sizes/dimensions or...
- Download Thumbnail
- Download Small
- Download Medium
- Download Large
- High Resolution Files
- IIIF Image JSON
- IIIF Image URL
- Accessibility
- View Extracted Text
Extracted Text
The following text was automatically extracted from the image on this page using optical character recognition software:
43
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69LTC RICHARDELLA: Locally, at
Miramr, there's quite a bit of discussion.
Did you mean --
CHAIRMAN COURTER: In other
words, you checked with Fish & Wildlife, and
they confirmed the fact that there may be
envirormentat sensitivities or prohibitions or
limits with regard to the Miramr expansion?
LTC RICHAROELLA: They went
further than that. They said there most
definitely is, and their recommendation was
not to do and not to perform any development
or construction that would affect the critical
habitats or endangered species on the base at
Mi ramwr.
CHAIRMAN COURTER: Did the
Navy at all address that problem or approach
Fish & Wildlife, to your knowledge?
LTC RICHARDELLA: Not to the
degree that we were able to do locally.
MR. YELLIN: Why don't we put
up slide 16 with the amp?
This is the same type of chart
that we used for the East Coast air stations.
It has similar information on it, some of
which we have already talked about. But as
you can see here, there are substantial
increases in the base loading at the remaining
bases to absorb the assets from Tustin and Et
Toro and the movement of Miramar to Lemoore.
And as you can also see under
the Marine Air Corps Station El Toro column
down at the bottom in the total one-time costs
column, you can see the 5898 million, and
that's a reflection of the very significant
construction that is required through the DOD
proposal.
GEN JOHNSON: But you said
about half of that was housing?
LTC RICHARDELLA: No. I think
those costs don't include such housing at altl,
and those --
LTC RICHARDELLA: The
assumption, General, in this number was that
no housing would be required in the San Diego
market by virtue of the ruster of military
units available. The 430 million that was
discussed with respect to housing in that area
was included in the $1.2 billion estimate
given to us by the ccmseity in Orange County.
GEN JOHNSON: We'll look under
air encroachment. Having visited Southern
California many times, it's hard to believe
there is no air encroachment at Tustin or EL
Toro.
LTC RICHARDELLA: General,
that's my answer there. I agree with you
completely; however, the ordinances in effect
around both El Toro and Tustin have precluded
development that would impinge on any
operational requirements that either one of
those bases have. They're able to perform the
missions at the force levels they are now with
no trouble.
SEN JOHNSON: But back when
you talked about Ceci l, you talked about a
potential landfiLl and a potential this, that,
and the other, and these areas of Southern
California, that area has been trying to pushout noncommercial aviation for many years.
certainly there is potential future -- W
LTC RICHARDELLA: Yes, sir, I
would agree, but we also heard very strongly
out there that the option of making that
airport, EL Toro, into a commercial airport
was not the view of a Large percentage of that
county, not the preference.
GEM JOHNSON: Mr. Kraus, wouLd
you Like to comment?
MS. KRAUS: The air space
aronrid El Toro and Mirmear both are sort of
between the airways where the air space right
around the airport itself is, basically, clear
of congestion because of the designated air
space around that airport. There is heavy
activity in the whoLe Southern California
area. I wiLL agree to that, sir.
GEM JOHNSON: Going back to
the Last one, how would you compare that to
Cecil FieLd?
MS. KRAUS: That one I wouLd
have to Look into a Little bit more closely,
sir. I have not done a comparison on the East
Coast/Vest Coast yet.
CHAIRMAN COURTER: Would you
be able to do that for us, please?
MS. KRAUS: Yes, sir.
COMMISSIONER STUART: Could
you comment on Lewoore, and do you have a
guesstimate of the M4ILCON involved?
LTC RICHARDELLA: Yes, sir.
That nuer is approximately S260 mi lion.
COMMISSIONER STUART: $260?
LTC RICHARDELLA: $260. Yes,
sir.
COMMISSIONER STUART: That's
stilL lower than any of the numbers for
Miramar.
LTC RICHARDELLA: Yes, sir.
COMMISSIONER STUART: Now
about air space?
LTC RICHARDELLA: Excuse me?
CMIISSIONER STUART: Air
space. Mo problem up there?
LTC RICHARDELLA: Air space at
Lemoore? No problem with encroachment. Mo,
sir.
COMMISSIONER STUART: Just to
summarize where we are with regard to these
Naval air stations on the West Coast, in order
to preserve -- I think everybody knows and we
kind of know that this is going to require
additional study, additional review, that it's
a complex mix, and when you change one thing,
it affects something else. There's various
proposals. There's the Cunningham proposal,
the DOD proposal, the Congressman Jerry Lewis
proposal, the Orange Couinty proposal, the
reinstating Tustin proposal.
Qne of the things that we have
to do, and maybe Mr. Behrmam can keep track
of this and Mr. Borden, in order to preserve
our options -- because that's reaLLy what I
want to do right now, because 1 don't ko
where I'm going to lard, where I'm going to
end up~ on this mix of faciLities and
movmets. It seems to me that we should
entertain a action. In order to preserve allWt...d
Upcoming Pages
Here’s what’s next.
Search Inside
This document can be searched. Note: Results may vary based on the legibility of text within the document.
Matching Search Results
View 10 places within this document that match your search.Tools / Downloads
Get a copy of this page or view the extracted text.
Citing and Sharing
Basic information for referencing this web page. We also provide extended guidance on usage rights, references, copying or embedding.
Reference the current page of this Legal Document.
United States. Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission. 1995 Army Team Lead Desk Material - Adds to List Hearing, May 21, 1993, legal document, February 17, 2006; (https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc25520/m1/46/?q=food+rule+for+unt+students: accessed July 18, 2024), University of North Texas Libraries, UNT Digital Library, https://digital.library.unt.edu; crediting UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.