Decision making and how it affects job satisfaction among public school principals in the north Texas area Page: V

                                
LIST OF TABLES

Table
Page
1. Composition of Survey Participants by Total
Number of Years of Experience .      . . .  . .  53
2. Composition of Survey Participants by Years
of Experience as a Principal  . . . . . .   . .  54
3. Composition of Survey Participants by Gender .    . 55
4. Composition of Survey Participants by Highest
Level of Educational Attainment  . . ..  . . .  55
5.  Composition of Survey Participants by Age-     - . . .  56
6. Composition of Survey Participants by Level
of  Assignment  .  .  .  .  . .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  56
7.  Rank Order of Decision Making Statements from
Greatest Degree of Agreement to Least
Degree of Agreement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
8. Mean Scores on Principal Decision Making Survey
by Total Years of Experience   . . .   . . .  . 63
9. Mean Scores on Principal DecisionsMaking Survey
by Total Years of Experience as a Principal  ,   64
10. Mean Scores on Principal Decision Making Survey
by Gender . .              .                . . 65
11. Mean Scores on Principal Decision Making Surve
by Highest Level of Degree Attained - . .  . . . 65
12. Mean Scores on Principal Decision Making Survey
by  Age  .  .  .  .  .  .  ' -     - .   -  -  -  -  -  -  -"  . . 66
13. Mean Scores on Principal Decision Making Survey
by Level of Assignment  . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
14.  Pearson Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient,
t-Test, Degrees of Freedom, and Significance
of Principal Decision Making and the Job
Satisfaction Variable of Work on Present Job  - 69

V