A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Traditional and Experience Methods of Teaching Percentage in Seventh-Grade Arithmetic Page: IV

                                
UST CP
TaMe
I. PreQueaey Distribution of Intelligence Quo-
tients af<€B@Bp.yjKB&.ap#Hp.x:. . .. . g?
g* Fpeqwaey Distribution of Seerea on Peam V of
A&lt&metle §#st fw Group T aa& §rcup & * * 29
3. Frequency Distribution of Scores onP^mVcf
Arithmetic 3est for Rreup T and e^up E . . 31
4. Differences in Scores on Form V and F03M8 W of
the Arithmetic Test in Relationship to
Intelligence Quotients of the Ten Pwpils
in Group T with Highest Intelligence
37
5. Differences in Scores on Forst V and FOBS W of
the'Arithmetic Test in Relationship to
Intelligence Quotients of ^e Tea Pupils
in Qroup T with lowest Intelligence
# # # * * # e e e * * # * * * * *
6. Differences in Scores on Fo^m t and Form W of
the -Arithmetic Test la Relationship to
' Intelligence Quotients of the Ten Pupils
in Oroup E with Highest Intelligence
^noticnts * # * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
7. Differences in Scores on Para V and Peaa W of '
the Arithmetic Test in Relationship to
'Intelligence Quotients of the Ten Pupils
in group E with lowest Intelligence
Quotients . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
8. Comparison of Qroup T and a&oup E Mean Scores
en Hoth'Paras of the Arithmetic Teat Based
on Mean Intelligence Quotients of the Ten
Highest and Ten Lowest Intelligence Scare*
in-Sa^^^&^cup * + * -a *- * # * * ** < '* * * * 4l
iv