Optimizing the National TRU waste system transportation program. Page: 3 of 8
This article is part of the collection entitled: Office of Scientific & Technical Information Technical Reports and was provided to Digital Library by the UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.
The following text was automatically extracted from the image on this page using optical character recognition software:
Spectrum 2002, August 4-8, 2002, Reno, NV
amended several times, primarily to expand the allowable payload of the packaging and
allow shipment under less restrictive conditions. The NRC imposed strict limits for
flammable, volatile, and semi-volatile gas concentrations in each waste package to ensure
safety during the 60-day shipping period. Two primary limits imposed by the NRC on the
shipping payload are: 1) the concentration of flammable gases (i.e., hydrogen and
methane), must not exceed 5 percent (by volume), and 2) the gas phase concentration of
flammable volatile organic compounds (VOCs) must be less than 0.05 percent (500
ppm). As a result, 20-40% of the TRU waste currently stored at the DOE sites could not
be shipped in the TRUPACT-Il unless it would be repackaged (which would result in a
significant volume increase and an increase in potential exposure), prior to the approval
of Revision 19 of the TRUPACT-Il Safety Analysis Report (SAR).
Revision 19 of the TRUPACT-Il SAR was by far the most complex submitted to date to
the NRC for approval. This revision included: 1) revised packaging and payload
assembly drawings to remove unnecessary details and clarify requirements; 2) simplified
chemical compatibility methodology-all chemicals identified by the sites were included
and listed; 3) revised pressure calculations to increase wattage limits; 4) additional
methods to determine aspiration times based on measurement inside the rigid liner at the
time of venting; 5) increased decay heat limits for 55-gallon drums overpacked in a
standard waste box; 6) addition of 100-gallon drums as an authorized payload container;
7) two new shielded pipe configurations (S100 for neutron [sealed sources) and S200 for
gamma; 8) revised Operations, Maintenance, and Acceptance Tests to incorporate lessons
learned from experience to date; and 9) made the TRU Authorized Methods for Payload
Here’s what’s next.
This article can be searched. Note: Results may vary based on the legibility of text within the document.
Tools / Downloads
Get a copy of this page or view the extracted text.
Citing and Sharing
Basic information for referencing this web page. We also provide extended guidance on usage rights, references, copying or embedding.
Reference the current page of this Article.
Lott, S. A. (Sheila A.) & Countiss, S. (Sue). Optimizing the National TRU waste system transportation program., article, January 1, 2002; United States. (digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc932813/m1/3/: accessed February 18, 2019), University of North Texas Libraries, Digital Library, digital.library.unt.edu; crediting UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.