EFFICACY OF FILTRATION PROCESSES TO OBTAIN WATER CLARITY AT K EAST SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL (SNF) BASIN Page: 4 of 84
This report is part of the collection entitled: Office of Scientific & Technical Information Technical Reports and was provided to UNT Digital Library by the UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.
Extracted Text
The following text was automatically extracted from the image on this page using optical character recognition software:
Page 1 of 85 of DA03573991
RPP-RPT-30093, Rev. 0
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1. Schematic of the Scattering of Light by a Suspended Particle via the Processes of
Reflection, Refraction, and Diffraction...... ........................................................ 3
Figure 2. Attenuation Cross-section (Attenuation Per Unit Mass) of a Suspension of Spherical
Particles as a Function of Their Diameter.............................................. 4
Figure 3. Composite Suspended Solids versus NTU Values............................................... 7
Figure 4. Effluent Turbidity Using KE Basin Challenge (NTU Values)....................................... 8
Figure 5. Composite Turbidity Retained by the Filter.........,..............................................,.... 8
Figure 6. Estimated Solids Retained by the 40- m PALL Filter...................... 9
Figure 7. Pressure Differential Across the 40-pm PALL Filter................................................ 9
Figure 8. Effluent Turbidity Using KE Basin Challenge............................................................ 11
Figure 9. Composite Turbidity Retained by the Filter............................................................ 11
Figure 10. Estimated Solids Retained by the 5-pm Filter.........................................................12
Figure 11. Pressure Differential Across the 5-gm Filter............ ..................................... 12
Figure 12. Volume-based Particle Size Distributions of KE-Basin Water Composite............. 14
Figure 13. Volume-based Particle Size Distributions of 40-pm Filtrat....................................... 14
Figure 14. Effluent Turbidity From 10-pm Keystone Filter Using KE Basin Challenge ..... 15
Figure 15. Composite Turbidity Retained by 10-pm Keystone Filter.............................. 16
Figure 16. Estimated Solids Retained by the 10-pm Keystone Filter.................. 16
Figure 17. Pressure Differential Across the 10-pm Keystone Filter................... 17
Figure 18. Effluent Turbidity From 10--pm PALL Using KE Basin Challenge........... 17
Figure 19. Composite Turbidity Retained by 20-pm PALL Filter.. ................................. 18
Figure 20. Estimated Solids Retained by the 10-pm PALL Filter...................................... 18
Figure 21. Pressure Differential Across the 10-pm PALL Filter ........................................... 19
Figure 22. Volume-based Particle Size Distributions of KE-Basin Water Influent to
the 10-jm K eystone Filter...................... .................... ..................................... 20
Figure 23. Volume-based Particle Size Distributions of 10 un Keystone Filtrate.................. 21
Figure 24. Volume-based Particle Size Distributions of KE-Basin Water Influent to
the 10-m PALL Filter........................................................................................... 21
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1. Initial and Average Turbidity Measured During Scouting Tests.....................................6
Table 2. Radionuclides Retained on the 40- m PALL Filter............................. 10
Table 3. Mass of Analytes Above Detection Limit Captured by the 40-sm PALL Filter ..... 10
Table 4. Mass of Analytes Above Detection Limit Captured by the 5-pm Filter .....,.......... 13
Table 5. Radionuclides Retained on the 5- m Keystone Filter...................... 13
Table 6. Radionuclides Retained on the 10-gm Keystone Filter.............................................. 19
Table 7. Radionuclides Retained on the 1 0-pni PALL Filter....................... 20
Table 8. 10-pm Keystone Filter ............................. 22
Table 9. 10-pm PALL Filter....................... ............................... ...................... 23
Table 10. Ratio of Radionuclide to Total Suspended Solids 10-pm Keystone Filter............... 23
Table 11. Ratio of Radionuclide to Total Suspended Solids 10-pm PALL Filter....................... 23
Table 12. Estimated Radionuclide Loading in Ci on a Commercial Keystone 10-pm Filter at
Indicated Time...... ........ ...... .................. .. ..... ............ ........ 24ii
Upcoming Pages
Here’s what’s next.
Search Inside
This report can be searched. Note: Results may vary based on the legibility of text within the document.
Tools / Downloads
Get a copy of this page or view the extracted text.
Citing and Sharing
Basic information for referencing this web page. We also provide extended guidance on usage rights, references, copying or embedding.
Reference the current page of this Report.
JB, DUNCAN. EFFICACY OF FILTRATION PROCESSES TO OBTAIN WATER CLARITY AT K EAST SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL (SNF) BASIN, report, September 28, 2006; Richland, Washington. (https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc899160/m1/4/: accessed April 25, 2024), University of North Texas Libraries, UNT Digital Library, https://digital.library.unt.edu; crediting UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.