Analysis of Joint URBAN 2003 Wind and Turbulence Profiles and Comparison with FEM3MP Simulations Page: 4 of 18
This article is part of the collection entitled: Office of Scientific & Technical Information Technical Reports and was provided to Digital Library by the UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.
The following text was automatically extracted from the image on this page using optical character recognition software:
National security demands improved modeling of
atmospheric flow in urban environments
*CFD models are currently appropriate
for sensor-siting studies or post-event
EComputational shortcuts, like virtual
buildings or simplified atmospheric
conditions, may make CFD appropriate
for emergency-response capabilities if
processor speeds continue to increase
*When compared with observations of
flow within cities, are CFD results
-e Test with Joint URBAN 2003 data
on daytime (IOP3) and nighttime
. - - -
- , -
-- - -
- I - - --
Keith Meyers, New York Times, 9 May 2005:
chlorine tanks at Ports Elizabeth and Newark,
with Manhattan in the background
Here’s what’s next.
This article can be searched. Note: Results may vary based on the legibility of text within the document.
Tools / Downloads
Get a copy of this page or view the extracted text.
Citing and Sharing
Basic information for referencing this web page. We also provide extended guidance on usage rights, references, copying or embedding.
Reference the current page of this Article.
Lundquist, J K & Chan, S T. Analysis of Joint URBAN 2003 Wind and Turbulence Profiles and Comparison with FEM3MP Simulations, article, July 11, 2005; Livermore, California. (digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc875036/m1/4/: accessed January 21, 2019), University of North Texas Libraries, Digital Library, digital.library.unt.edu; crediting UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.