Final Report - IHLW PCT, Spinel T1%, Electrical Conductivity, and Viscosity Model Development, VSL-07R1240-4 Page: 24 of 814
This report is part of the collection entitled: Office of Scientific & Technical Information Technical Reports and was provided to UNT Digital Library by the UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.
Extracted Text
The following text was automatically extracted from the image on this page using optical character recognition software:
ORP-56320 Rev. 0
The Catholic University ofAmerica IHLW PCT, Spinel TI, Electrical Conductivity,
Vitreous State Laboratory and Viscosity Model Development
Final Report, VSL-07R1240-4, Rev. 0
Figure 7.19. Prediction Standard Deviations versus Predicted ln(EC) Values over
the HLW Glass Compositions in the Modeling Dataset and Temperatures
950, 1050, 1150, and 1250 C, Obtained Using the Recommended
22-Term Electrical Conductivity Model ....................................................................F-100
Figure 8.1. Ranges and Distributions of Components Mass Fractions (x-axes) for 210
HLW Glass Compositions with Viscosity Data.........................................................F-101
Figure 8.2. Ranges and Distributions of Components Mass Fractions (x-axes) for 208
HLW Glass Compositions with Viscosity Data After Deleting Two
Outliers from the Initial 210 Glasses .........................................................................F-103
Figure 8.3. Scatterplot Matrix of 18 Components Mass Fractions for 208
HLW Glass Compositions with Viscosity Data After Deleting Two
Outliers from the Initial 210 Glasses .........................................................................F-105
Figure 8.4. Predicted Versus Measured Plot for the 197 HLW Glasses in
the Viscosity Modeling Dataset Constructed Using the 44-Term
Truncated T2-Linear Mixture Model.........................................................................F-106
Figure 8.5. Standardized Residuals Plot for the 197 HLW Glasses in the
Viscosity Modeling Dataset Constructed Using the 44-Term
Truncated T2-Linear Mixture Model.........................................................................F-106
Figure 8.6. Predicted Versus Measured ln(Viscosity, poise) Values for each of the Five
Data-Splitting Validation Subsets of the 197 HLW Glasses in the Viscosity
Modeling Dataset Constructed Using the 44-Term Truncated
T2-Linear Mixture Model..........................................................................................F-107
Figure 8.7. Predicted Versus Measured ln(Viscosity, poise) Values for each of the Five
Data-Splitting Validation Subsets of the 197 HLW Glasses in the Viscosity
Modeling Dataset Constructed Using the 44-Term Truncated
T2-Linear Mixture Model. Error bars are 95% prediction intervals (PIs).
The number of glasses whose 95% PIs do not include the measured values
(represented by the 450 line) is shown .......................................................................F-107
Figure 8.8a. Response Trace Plot for IHLW Viscosity at 950 C Constructed
Using the 44-Term Truncated T2-Linear Mixture Model..........................................F-108
Figure 8.8b. Response Trace Plot for IHLW Viscosity at 1050 C Constructed
Using the 44-Term Truncated T2-Linear Mixture Model..........................................F-108
Figure 8.8c. Response Trace Plot for IHLW Viscosity at 1150 C Constructed
Using the 44-Term Truncated T2-Linear Mixture Model..........................................F-109
Figure 8.8d. Response Trace Plot for IHLW Viscosity at 1250 C Constructed
Using the 44-Term Truncated T2-Linear Mixture Model..........................................F-109
Figure 8.9. Predicted Versus Measured Plot for the 197 HLW Glasses in the Viscosity
Modeling Dataset Constructed Using the 27-Term Truncated
T2-Linear Mixture Model..........................................................................................F-110
Figure 8.10. Standardized Residuals Plot for the 197 HLW Glasses in the Viscosity
Modeling Dataset Constructed Using the 27-Term Truncated
T2-Linear Mixture Model..........................................................................................F-110
Figure 8.11. Predicted versus Measured ln(Viscosity, poise) Values for each of the Five
Data-Splitting Validation Subsets of the 197 HLW Glasses in the Viscosity
Modeling Dataset Constructed Using the 27-Term Truncated
T2-Linear Mixture Model..........................................................................................F-111
xxi
Upcoming Pages
Here’s what’s next.
25 of 814
26 of 814
27 of 814
28 of 814
Search Inside
This report can be searched. Note: Results may vary based on the legibility of text within the document.
Tools / Downloads
Get a copy of this page or view the extracted text.
Citing and Sharing
Basic information for referencing this web page. We also provide extended guidance on usage rights, references, copying or embedding.
Reference the current page of this Report.
Kruger, Albert A.; Piepel, Gregory F.; Landmesser, S. M.; Pegg, I. L.; Heredia-Langner, Alejandro; Cooley, Scott K. et al. Final Report - IHLW PCT, Spinel T1%, Electrical Conductivity, and Viscosity Model Development, VSL-07R1240-4, report, November 13, 2013; Richland, Washington. (https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc868178/m1/24/: accessed April 24, 2024), University of North Texas Libraries, UNT Digital Library, https://digital.library.unt.edu; crediting UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.