The Use Of Societal Impacts Considerations In Grant Proposal Peer Review: A Comparison Of Five Models

PDF Version Also Available for Download.

Description

This article discusses the use of societal impacts considerations in grant proposal peer review in scientific and technical research.

Physical Description

12 p.

Creation Information

Holbrook, J. Britt 2010.

Context

This article is part of the collection entitled: UNT Scholarly Works and was provided by UNT College of Arts and Sciences to Digital Library, a digital repository hosted by the UNT Libraries. It has been viewed 323 times , with 5 in the last month . More information about this article can be viewed below.

Who

People and organizations associated with either the creation of this article or its content.

Author

Publisher

Provided By

UNT College of Arts and Sciences

The UNT College of Arts and Sciences educates students in traditional liberal arts, performing arts, sciences, professional, and technical academic programs. In addition to its departments, the college includes academic centers, institutes, programs, and offices providing diverse courses of study.

Contact Us

What

Descriptive information to help identify this article. Follow the links below to find similar items on the Digital Library.

Degree Information

Description

This article discusses the use of societal impacts considerations in grant proposal peer review in scientific and technical research.

Physical Description

12 p.

Notes

Abstract: Increasing demands on the part of the public for a demonstrable return on their investment in scientific and technical research have led to the widespread introduction of considerations of societal impacts into the peer review processes at public science and technology funding agencies. This answer to the accountability challenge also introduces a peculiar strain on peer review: expertise in particular areas of scientific and technical research is no guarantee of expertise in addressing the societal impacts of proposed research. Presenting preliminary results of a larger study, this article describes five current models of the peer review of grant proposals and shows that different agencies have very different ways of incorporating societal impacts considerations. The article also elucidates a notion of theoretical adequacy, which will be used to determine whether and how some peer review processes are better than others. The objectives of this article are to lay out the description of the agencies and to offer a preliminary assessment of each model's theoretical adequacy. The objective of the authors' larger study is to determine the best ways to incorporate societal impacts considerations into the peer review of grant proposals, thus helping funding agencies respond to the demand for demonstrable results.

Source

  • Technology and Innovation, 2010, Putnam Valley: Cognizant Communications Corporation, pp. 213-224

Language

Item Type

Identifier

Unique identifying numbers for this article in the Digital Library or other systems.

Publication Information

  • Publication Title: Technology and Innovation
  • Volume: 12
  • Page Start: 213
  • Page End: 224
  • Peer Reviewed: Yes

Collections

This article is part of the following collection of related materials.

UNT Scholarly Works

Materials from the UNT community's research, creative, and scholarly activities and UNT's Open Access Repository. Access to some items in this collection may be restricted.

What responsibilities do I have when using this article?

When

Dates and time periods associated with this article.

Creation Date

  • 2010

Added to The UNT Digital Library

  • May 18, 2012, 10:45 a.m.

Description Last Updated

  • July 16, 2013, 2:34 p.m.

Usage Statistics

When was this article last used?

Yesterday: 0
Past 30 days: 5
Total Uses: 323

Interact With This Article

Here are some suggestions for what to do next.

Start Reading

PDF Version Also Available for Download.

Citations, Rights, Re-Use

Holbrook, J. Britt. The Use Of Societal Impacts Considerations In Grant Proposal Peer Review: A Comparison Of Five Models, article, 2010; [Putnam Valley, New York]. (digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc84349/: accessed May 22, 2018), University of North Texas Libraries, Digital Library, digital.library.unt.edu; crediting UNT College of Arts and Sciences.