Plasma-based Accelerator with Magnetic Compression Page: 4 of 8
This report is part of the collection entitled: Office of Scientific & Technical Information Technical Reports and was provided to Digital Library by the UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.
The following text was automatically extracted from the image on this page using optical character recognition software:
Consider homogeneous, uniformly magnetized plasma,
i.e., B= B(t)i, where B(t) changes with time. For ex-
ample, this could be realized within a plasma column
confined inside a solenoid carrying a time-varying cur-
rent. Magnetization implies that the plasma density, n,
varies with B1. For slow variation of plasma parame-
ters, a plasma wave with wavevector k B obeys the
eikonal equation : 2 P + 3k2)vT, where og is
the electron thermal velocity parallel to the magnetic
field. In the case of an ultrarelativistic plasma wave, i.e.,
tph =w/k ~ c, the cold plasma eikonal equation suffices,
rw =oP. Since wP a n a B, we have Lp =oP(t), while k
remains constant (neglecting nonlinear effects ), since
the compression is perpendicular to the wavevector. In
the neighborhood of w/k c, changes in n result in large
changes in w/k, so that minimal compression is needed
to retain proper phasing of relativistic particles.
The axial dynamics of a relativistic electron interact-
ing with a sinusoidal potential exhibiting a dynamically
changing vph(t) are captured by the equations :
where ke - T(t), ,ymec2 is the electron energy in
the laboratory frame, e is the elementary charge, and
S(t) f0 w(k; t') dt'. Because minimal compression is
anticipated to correct the wave phase velocity, the electric
field amplitude Eo const.
The compression profile required to overcome phase
slippage in PBWA can be calculated from Eqs. (1) and
(2). Suppose T(t) is configured such that a stable fixed
point arises in the phase space associated with the rest
frame of the accelerating plasma wave. Then, combin-
ing Eqs. (1) and (2) by eliminating the square root gives
4 4o( + 41) cos (, with 4Po _eEo/kmec2. If
corresponding to the fixed point, there exists an energy-
like integral of motion: d/dt(y - 4oI cos o) 0. Equa-
tion (2) yields the necessary plasma compression profile.
Noting that 4' ,p(t), and that the distance traversed
by a phase-locked particle D(t) (T - To)/k, the re-
quired normalized density profile, = wg/wjo, is:
n[D(t)] ='o ('o + 4okDcos o) - ] (3)
(-y- 1) (yo + okD cos o)2'
where yo =Ypho (1 -- Ph /c2)-1/2 implies exact
initial wave-particle resonance. This expression for h
is monotonic in D, asymptotically approaching hmax
yo/(yo - 1) as D -> o (and, hence, -y -> o). For in-
stance, to accelerate a 2 MeV electron bunch ('o ~ 4)
to arbitrarily high energies requires a peak density shift
hmax ~ 1.07, demonstrating that only small changes in
density are needed to accelerate relativistic electrons to
arbitrarily high energies while maintaining the proper
wave-particle phase relationship. Physically, the quan-
tity hmax represents the total change in density required
for vph -> c. To express Eq. (3) as an explicit function
of time, one integrates D(t) f4 v dt' for a relativistic
particle at fixed phase in the accelerating potential:
D(t) = - act + - 1 + 1 -y , (4)
with a eEo cos o/mec2. The fixed point assumes zero
transverse momentum, which equates to a compression
profile optimized to trap relativistic particles with a nar-
row transverse energy spread.
Peak acceleration occurs when o 0, for which an
electron starting at = 0 obeys y - 40'= const. In
fact, for a wave of specified Eo and k, this is the maximum
achievable acceleration, in which the electron experiences
the peak accelerating field as the wave and electron ac-
celerate together. More generally, choosing o : (0, 7r/2)
in Eq. (3) leads to compression profiles enabling electron
trapping over a broader range of initial electron energies,
at the cost of slower acceleration. This is because the
fixed point in the wave rest frame, o, lies ahead of the
peak accelerating field, at 0, allowing some particles
that slip behind o to catch up to o once again.
Wakefield acceleration with compression. Mitigating
phase slippage through magnetic compression in (linear)
wakefield acceleration, including LWFA and PWFA, is a
somewhat different process. Here, a time-varying density
profile during wake excitation results in an axial gradient
in the plasma wake parameters, which was not the case
with PBWA. Electron dephasing is often the dominant
effect limiting energy gain in wakefield acceleration when
the driver amplitude is no more than weakly relativistic,
i.e., eA/mec2 < 1 for LWFA, where A is the peak vector
potential of the laser driver , or nb/n < 1 for PWFA,
where nb is the peak driver beam density .
In wakefield acceleration, a subluminal wakefield is
excited by an ultrarelativistic driver, i.e., Yd (1 -
02)-1/2 1, with d vd/c, and vd is the driver
pulse velocity. For PWFA, the longitudinal velocity of
the electron beam driver, vb, is unaffected by the per-
pendicular magnetic compression. Because only modest
density changes will be needed, the laser pulse group ve-
locity, tgr, is mostly unaffected as well, since a change
in plasma frequency, AOP, leads to a change in wave
phase velocity Avph/ph A p/op, which is large com-
pared to the change in laser group velocity, Avgr/vgr ~
(Lp/wd)2AwP/wP, where Wd is the characteristic laser fre-
quency, and wp/wd < 1 in underdense plasma. Thus,
both PWFA and LWFA can be treated similarly, where
the characteristic driver velocity vd const.
We follow the technique of Ref.  to derive the re-
quired density profile (in the 1D limit) to maintain a
1/ eI cos (
/ 1 \ 1/2 c
C1 - -W,
Here’s what’s next.
This report can be searched. Note: Results may vary based on the legibility of text within the document.
Tools / Downloads
Get a copy of this page or view the extracted text.
Citing and Sharing
Basic information for referencing this web page. We also provide extended guidance on usage rights, references, copying or embedding.
Reference the current page of this Report.
Schmit, Paul F. & Fisch, Nathaniel J. Plasma-based Accelerator with Magnetic Compression, report, June 28, 2012; Princeton, New Jersey. (digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc827807/m1/4/: accessed December 12, 2018), University of North Texas Libraries, Digital Library, digital.library.unt.edu; crediting UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.