In Brief: Options to Help Meet a Congressional Requirement for Nuclear Weapon “Pit” Production Page: 3 of 14
The following text was automatically extracted from the image on this page using optical character recognition software:
In Brief: Nuclear Weapon "Pit" Production Options
* To reduce risk of collapse, loss of life, and radiation release from an earthquake,
NNSA increased the seismic resilience of PF-4. More steps are planned; more
could be taken.
Many options may boost U.S. pit production capacity, but none by itself could meet capacity and
schedule requirements. NNSA therefore faces the prospect of assembling a package of options,
and Congress faces the prospect of evaluating, perhaps amending, and approving it. Arriving at a
satisfactory package will require complex analyses to optimize among such goals as margin, cost,
worker safety, and throughput. At issue for Congress: What are the risks, costs, and benefits of the
options? What is the optimum package?
This report is a condensed version of CRS Report R44033, Nuclear Weapon "Pit" Production:
Options to Help Meet a Congressional Requirement, by Jonathan E. Medalia.
Congressional Research Service
Here’s what’s next.
This report can be searched. Note: Results may vary based on the legibility of text within the document.
Tools / Downloads
Get a copy of this page or view the extracted text.
Citing and Sharing
Basic information for referencing this web page. We also provide extended guidance on usage rights, references, copying or embedding.
Reference the current page of this Report.
In Brief: Options to Help Meet a Congressional Requirement for Nuclear Weapon “Pit” Production, report, May 22, 2015; Washington D.C.. (digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc817597/m1/3/: accessed December 18, 2018), University of North Texas Libraries, Digital Library, digital.library.unt.edu; crediting UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.