Iran: U.S. Concerns and Policy Responses Page: 2 of 63
This report is part of the collection entitled: Congressional Research Service Reports and was provided to UNT Digital Library by the UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.
Extracted Text
The following text was automatically extracted from the image on this page using optical character recognition software:
Iran: U.S. Concerns and Policy Responses
Summary
President Obama has said his Administration shares the goals of the previous Administration to
contain Iran's strategic capabilities and regional influence. The Administration has not changed
the previous Administration's characterization of Iran as a "profound threat to U.S. national
security interests," a perception generated not only by Iran's nuclear program but also by its
military assistance to armed groups in Iraq and Afghanistan, to the Palestinian group Hamas, and
to Lebanese Hezbollah. However, the Obama Administration has formulated approaches to
achieve those goals that differ from those of its predecessor-in particular through expanded
direct diplomatic engagement with Iran. Prior to Iran's disputed June 12, 2009 presidential
elections, this U.S. outreach was put into practice with messages to the Iranian people by
President Obama, and through invitations to and contact with Iranian diplomats at multilateral
meetings. Attempting to convince Iran that the Administration is not hostile to Iran, the
Administration also downplayed Bush Administration policies to add international sanctions on
Iran, to fund civil society activists there, and to openly discuss potential U.S. military action
against Iranian nuclear facilities.
The Administration's Iran policy did not change significantly because of the Iranian crackdown
against protesters who alleged vast fraud in the June 12, 2009 presidential election, in which
incumbent President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was declared the winner. The unrest has represented
the most serious challenge, to date, to the regime's authority, although Iran's Supreme Leader
appears to be succeeding in quelling the public outcry and intra-regime tension as of September
2009. President Obama has criticized Iran's use of violence against protesters, but the President
apparently has sided with those in the Administration who want to take advantage of Iran's
internal weakness to obtain a compromise that curbs Iran's nuclear program. The Administration
has indicated that, if Iran refuses to return to the nuclear bargaining table by September 24, 2009
in earnest, it would return to working with allies to resume sanctioning and pressuring Iran. Those
threats may have contributed to Iran's announcement in early September 2009 that it is ready to
return to the multilateral talks. Some in Congress believe that bills in the 111th Congress, such as
H.R. 2194 and S. 908, which would tighten U.S. sanctions on Iran by penalizing sales to Iran of
gasoline, could help pressure Iran into a nuclear settlement. Others believe new U.S. unilateral
sanctions would cause Iran to dig in its heels and resist compromise.
The multilateral process on Iran's nuclear program remains as it has been since 2006 - attempting
to persuade Iran to limit its nuclear program by applying progressive multilateral economic
pressure on Iran while also offering it potential cooperation should it suspend its enrichment of
uranium. The pressure has taken the form of U.N. Security Council resolutions that ban weapons
of mass destruction (WMD)-related trade with Iran; freeze the assets of Iran's nuclear entities and
personalities; prevent Iran from transferring arms outside Iran; ban international travel by some
Iranians; call for inspections of some Iranian sea and airborne cargo shipments; and call for
restrictions on dealings with some Iranian banks. Separate U.S. efforts to persuade European
governments to curb trade, investment, and credits to Iran; and to convince foreign banks not to
do business with Iran, are intended to weaken Iran's economy and compound the U.N. pressure.
For further information, see CRS Report RS20871, Iran Sanctions, by Kenneth Katzman, CRS
Report RS22323, Iran's Activities and Influence in Iraq, by Kenneth Katzman, and CRS Report
RL34544, Iran's Nuclear Program: Status, by Paul K. Kerr.Congressional Research Service
Upcoming Pages
Here’s what’s next.
Search Inside
This report can be searched. Note: Results may vary based on the legibility of text within the document.
Tools / Downloads
Get a copy of this page or view the extracted text.
Citing and Sharing
Basic information for referencing this web page. We also provide extended guidance on usage rights, references, copying or embedding.
Reference the current page of this Report.
Katzman, Kenneth. Iran: U.S. Concerns and Policy Responses, report, September 4, 2009; Washington D.C.. (https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc816795/m1/2/: accessed April 24, 2024), University of North Texas Libraries, UNT Digital Library, https://digital.library.unt.edu; crediting UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.