Federal Budget Process Reform in the 111th Congress: A Brief Overview Page: 2 of 19
The following text was automatically extracted from the image on this page using optical character recognition software:
Federal Budget Process Reform in the 111th Congress: A Brief Overview
Procedural change is a recurrent feature of federal budgeting, although the scope and impact of
changes may vary from year to year. In order to advance their budgetary, economic, or political
objectives, both Congress and the President regularly propose and make changes to the federal
budget process. This report briefly discusses the context in which federal budget process changes
are made and identifies selected reform proposals by major category. The identification of reform
proposals in this report is not intended to be comprehensive.
A variety of sources give rise to the interest in budget process reform, including Congress, the
President, State and local government officials, and special commissions, among others. Congress
initiated a thorough overhaul of its internal budget process and ameliorated ongoing conflicts
with President Richard Nixon over the withholding of appropriated funds through enactment of
the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974. President Bill Clinton, like
many Presidents before him, requested line-item veto authority, which Congress granted in 1996
in the Line Item Veto Act (but was invalidated by court action in 1998). State and local
government officials were instrumental in securing passage of the Unfunded Mandates Reform
Act of 1995. Finally, special commissions, such as the President's National Commission on
Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States (the "9/11 Commission"), have recommended changes
in budget structure and procedure that have been adopted.
The federal budget process is rooted in constitutional mandates, statutory requirements, House
and Senate rules and practices, and administrative directives. Thus, there are several avenues
through which budget process changes can occur. Either chamber may focus on changes in its
rules, thereby minimizing the time needed to effect the change and the scale of potential conflict
needed to be resolved, but at the same time possibly minimizing the impact of the changes.
Broader and potentially more consequential changes, involving statutes or constitutional
amendments, may entail a larger set of participants in the decision-making (i.e., the other
chamber, the President, state legislatures), likely escalating the effort required to reach agreement
and lengthening the time period before the changes take effect.
Legislative changes in the budget process may take the form of freestanding bills or joint
resolutions (e.g., the Line Item Veto Act), or may be incorporated into other budgetary legislation,
such as acts raising the debt limit (e.g., the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act
of 1985, also referred to as the Gramm-Rudman-Hollings Act), implementing reconciliation
instructions (e.g., the Budget Enforcement Act of 1990), or providing annual appropriations (e.g.,
revisions in the Senate's cap on discretionary appropriations). Budget process changes also may
be included in the annual budget resolution (a concurrent resolution), or in simple House or
This report will be updated as developments warrant.
Congressional Research Service
Here’s what’s next.
This report can be searched. Note: Results may vary based on the legibility of text within the document.
Tools / Downloads
Get a copy of this page or view the extracted text.
Citing and Sharing
Basic information for referencing this web page. We also provide extended guidance on usage rights, references, copying or embedding.
Reference the current page of this Report.
Federal Budget Process Reform in the 111th Congress: A Brief Overview, report, November 30, 2009; Washington D.C.. (digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc811472/m1/2/: accessed September 22, 2018), University of North Texas Libraries, Digital Library, digital.library.unt.edu; crediting UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.