Supreme Court Appointment Process: Roles of the President, Judiciary Committee, and Senate Page: 2 of 74
The following text was automatically extracted from the image on this page using optical character recognition software:
Supreme Court Appointment Process: Roles of the
President, Judiciary Committee, and Senate
The appointment of a Supreme Court Justice is an event of major significance
in American politics. Each appointment is important because of the enormous
judicial power the Supreme Court exercises as the highest appellate court in the
federal judiciary. Appointments are usually infrequent, as a vacancy on the nine-
member Court may occur only once or twice, or never at all, during a particular
President's years in office. Under the Constitution, Justices on the Supreme Court
receive lifetime appointments. Such job security in the government has been
conferred solely on judges and, by constitutional design, helps insure the Court's
independence from the President and Congress.
The procedure for appointing a Justice is provided for by the Constitution in
only a few words. The "Appointments Clause" (Article II, Section 2, clause 2) states
that the President "shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the
Senate, shall appoint ... Judges of the supreme Court." The process of appointing
Justices has undergone changes over two centuries, but its most basic feature - the
sharing of power between the President and Senate - has remained unchanged: To
receive lifetime appointment to the Court, a candidate must first be nominated by the
President and then confirmed by the Senate. Although not mentioned in the
Constitution, an important role is played midway in the process (after the President
selects, but before the Senate considers) by the Senate Judiciary Committee.
On rare occasions, Presidents also have made Court appointments without the
Senate's consent, when the Senate was in recess. Such "recess appointments,"
however, were temporary, with their terms expiring at the end of the Senate's next
session. The last recess appointments to the Court, made in the 1950s, were
controversial because they bypassed the Senate and its "advice and consent" role.
The appointment of a Justice might or might not proceed smoothly. From the
first appointments in 1789, the Senate has confirmed 122 out of 158 Court
nominations. Of the 36 unsuccessful nominations, 11 were rejected in Senate roll-call
votes, while nearly all of the rest, in the face of committee or Senate opposition to the
nominee or the President, were withdrawn by the President or were postponed,
tabled, or never voted on by the Senate.
Over more than two centuries, a recurring theme in the Supreme Court
appointment process has been the assumed need for excellence in a nominee.
However, politics also has played an important role in Supreme Court appointments.
The political nature of the appointment process becomes especially apparent when
a President submits a nominee with controversial views, there are sharp partisan or
ideological differences between the President and the Senate, or the outcome of
important constitutional issues before the Court is seen to be at stake.
For a listing of all nominations to the Court and their outcomes, see CRS Report
RL33225, Supreme Court Nominations, 1789-2006: Actions by the Senate, the
Judiciary Committee, and the President.
Here’s what’s next.
This report can be searched. Note: Results may vary based on the legibility of text within the document.
Tools / Downloads
Get a copy of this page or view the extracted text.
Citing and Sharing
Basic information for referencing this web page. We also provide extended guidance on usage rights, references, copying or embedding.
Reference the current page of this Report.
Supreme Court Appointment Process: Roles of the President, Judiciary Committee, and Senate, report, March 20, 2008; Washington D.C.. (digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc810393/m1/2/: accessed January 23, 2018), University of North Texas Libraries, Digital Library, digital.library.unt.edu; crediting UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.