The Endangered Species Act (ESA) in the 110th Congress: Conflicting Values and Difficult Choices Page: 3 of 25
This report is part of the collection entitled: Congressional Research Service Reports and was provided to UNT Digital Library by the UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.
Extracted Text
The following text was automatically extracted from the image on this page using optical character recognition software:
Contents
Most Recent Developments ......... .
Introduction ..................... .
Background and Analysis .......... .
Overview ................... .
Major Provisions of Domestic Law
Listing ..................
Critical Habitat ........... .
Prohibitions and Penalties .. .
Permits and Consultation ... .
Exemptions ..............
Emergencies ............. .
Recovery Plans ........... .
Land Acquisition and Cooperal
M iscellaneous ............
Major Provisions of International La. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
ion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
.w . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7Is Species Protection and Restoration Working? . .
The Endangered Species Act and Climate ChangeIssues in the 110th Con
Critical Habitat D
"Sound Science" a
Information
Court Cases
Regional Resource
Klamath Riv
Pacific Salmo
Delta Smelt
Counterpart Regul
Private Property a
Additional Legisla
Appropriations . .
List of Tablesgress ................................
resignation ..............................
and ESA ...............................
Q uality ................................
on ESA and Science ..................... .
C onflicts ..............................
er B asin ...............................
n R estoration .......................... .
ations: Pesticides and Fire Management Projects
nd Fifth Amendment Takings .............. .
tive Initiatives .......................... .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..8
10
11
11
11
13
13
14
15
15
16
18
18
20
21Table 1. Percent Recovery Achieved Versus Time Listed .................. 9
Table 2. Funding for FWS Endangered Species and Related Programs,
FY2006-FY2009 ............................................ 22
Upcoming Pages
Here’s what’s next.
Search Inside
This report can be searched. Note: Results may vary based on the legibility of text within the document.
Tools / Downloads
Get a copy of this page or view the extracted text.
Citing and Sharing
Basic information for referencing this web page. We also provide extended guidance on usage rights, references, copying or embedding.
Reference the current page of this Report.
Buck, Eugene H.; Corn, M. Lynne; Sheikh, Pervaze A.; Meltz, Robert & Alexander, Kristina. The Endangered Species Act (ESA) in the 110th Congress: Conflicting Values and Difficult Choices, report, May 6, 2008; Washington D.C.. (https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc806417/m1/3/: accessed April 23, 2024), University of North Texas Libraries, UNT Digital Library, https://digital.library.unt.edu; crediting UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.