Census Monitoring Board: Congressional Members [website]

Census Monitoring Board: Congressional Members [website]

Description

Congress established the Census Monitoring Board to observe and monitor all aspects of the preparation and implementation of the 2000 decennial census. The method employed by the Census to count over 275 million Americans in 2000.

Creation Information

U.S. Census Monitoring Board June 26, 1998.

Context

This website is part of the collection entitled: CyberCemetery and was provided by the UNT Libraries Government Documents Department to the UNT Digital Library, a digital repository hosted by the UNT Libraries. It has been viewed 206 times. More information about this site can be viewed below.

Author

U.S. Census Monitoring Board

Publisher

U.S. Census Monitoring Board
Place of Publication: United States

Provided By

UNT Libraries Government Documents Department

Serving as both a federal and a state depository library, the UNT Libraries Government Documents Department maintains millions of items in a variety of formats. The department is a member of the FDLP Content Partnerships Program and an Affiliated Archive of the National Archives.

Titles

Main Title: Census Monitoring Board: Congressional Members [website]
Alternate Title: U.S. Census Monitoring Board: Congressional Members

Description

Congress established the Census Monitoring Board to observe and
monitor all aspects of the preparation and implementation of the 2000 decennial census. The method employed by the Census to count over 275 million Americans in 2000.

Notes

earliest date on site: 1998-06-26
latest date on site: 2001-09-30
site harvested: 2001-10-01
site uploaded to UNT server: 2001-11-01

Subjects

Legislative Indexing Vocabulary

Language

English

Item Type

Website

Identifier

Unique identifying numbers for this site in the Digital Library or other systems.

URL: http://govinfo.library.unt.edu/cmb/cmbc/index.htm External Link
Archival Resource Key: ark:/67531/metadc797

Relationships

Census 2000: A National Process Requires Local Focus: Report to Congress, 1 February 1999, ark:/67531/metadc2285463
Census Affects Children in Poverty, ark:/67531/metadc2285449
Census Effects on Access to Health Care, ark:/67531/metadc2285459
Comparison of Demographic Analysis, A.C.E., and Census 2000 Results by Race, ark:/67531/metadc2285470
Efecto del Conteo Inexacto del Censo 2000 sobre Fondos Federales para los Estados y Condados Seleccionados, 2002-2012, ark:/67531/metadc2285472
The Concerns of the Hard-to-Count Communities: Summary From the Undercount Summit and the Hispanic Federation Forum, ark:/67531/metadc2285466
Effect of Census 2000 Undercount on Federal Funding to States and Local Areas, 2002-2012, ark:/67531/metadc2285454
Effect of Census 2000 Undercount on Federal Funding to States and Selected Counties, 2002-2012, ark:/67531/metadc2285471
Effects of Census Undercount on School Planning, ark:/67531/metadc2285457
Examining the Effects of Census Adjustments on Estimates of Working-Age Uninsured Minorities in the United States, ark:/67531/metadc2285460
Final Letter Report to Congress, 1 September 2001, ark:/67531/metadc2285468
Generating Greater Participation in the 2000 Census: Analysis From a National Survey Conducted for U.S. Census Monitoring Board, ark:/67531/metadc2285484
A Guide to Statistical Adjustment: How It Really Works, ark:/67531/metadc2285469
How Would Adjusted 1990 Census Data Have Made a Difference?: A Case Study of Long Beach, CA, ark:/67531/metadc2285461
Profiling the Native American Community in Albuquerque: Assessing the Impacts of Census Undercounts and Adjustments, ark:/67531/metadc2285456
Questionnaire and Topline Results From a National Survey Regarding the 2000 Census for the U.S. Census Monitoring Board Presidential Members, ark:/67531/metadc2285486
U.S. Census Monitoring Board Field Observations From Fifty-One Local Census Offices: Report to Congress, October 1, 2000, ark:/67531/metadc2285467
U.S. Census Monitoring Board Field Observations of the New York and Dallas Regional and Local Census Offices, Alaska Enumeration, and Household Matching Training, ark:/67531/metadc2285483
U.S. Census Monitoring Board: Presidential Members: Final Report to Congress, ark:/67531/metadc2285452
U.S. Census Monitoring Board Presidential Members Report to Congress: April 11, 2001, ark:/67531/metadc2285451
U.S. Census Monitoring Board Presidential Members Report to Congress: February 1, 1999, ark:/67531/metadc2285450
U.S. Census Monitoring Board Presidential Members Report to Congress: June 9, 1999, ark:/67531/metadc2285455
U.S. Census Monitoring Board Report to Congress: April 1, 1999, ark:/67531/metadc2285464
U.S. Census Monitoring Board Report to Congress: October 1, 1999, ark:/67531/metadc2285487
Undercounting Commuters, ark:/67531/metadc2285458
Unkept Promise: Statistical Adjustment Fails to Eliminate Local Undercounts, as Revealed by Evaluation of Severely Undercounted Blocks From the 1990 Census Plan, ark:/67531/metadc2285465
Junta de Control del Censo de los Estados Unidos Observaciones de las operaciones de campo de cincuenta y una Oficinas locales de censo: Reporte al Congreso, 1ero de octubre del 2000, ark:/67531/metadc2285462
Consecuencias de los errores de recuento en el Censo 2000 en la financiación federal a los estados y localidades, 2002-2012, ark:/67531/metadc2285485

Collections

This site is part of the following collection of related materials.

CyberCemetery

The CyberCemetery provides permanent public access to the web sites and publications of defunct U.S. government agencies and commissions. This collection is provided through a partnership between the UNT Libraries, the U.S. Government Printing Office (GPO), and the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), as part of the Federal Depository Library Program.

Related Items

Census 2000: A National Process Requires Local Focus: Report to Congress, 1 February 1999 (Report)

Report by the Congressional Members of the U.S. Census Monitoring Board criticizing the plans of the Census Bureau and the Department of Commerce to use statistical adjustment to correct any potential undercounts in the upcoming 2000 census. The Board instead favors using technology and local methods in order to track down the people who were missed, rather than making statistical estimates.