Comparison of Calculational Results from Different Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF) Crumbling Approaches Page: 1 of 69
This report is part of the collection entitled: Office of Scientific & Technical Information Technical Reports and was provided to Digital Library by the UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.
The following text was automatically extracted from the image on this page using optical character recognition software:
I [, !g Page 1 of
JN 2000 l ENGINEERING DATA TRANSMITTAL E 5 61 [0
HA 25 LOGO 1. EDT CV L
2. To: (Receiving Organization) 3. From: (Originating Organization) 4. Related EDT No.:
Distribution Nuclear Safety N/A
5. Proj./Prog./Dept./Div.: 6. Design Authority/ Design Agent/Cog. Engr.: 7. Purchase Order No.:
Spent Nuclear Fuel M. G. Piepho, 376-8009, R3-26 N/A
8. Originator Remarks: 9. Equip./Component No.:
For approval and release. 10. System/BIdg./Facility:
11. Receiver Remarks: 11A. Design Baseline Document? [ ]Yes [x] No 12. Major Assm. Dwg. No.:
13. Permit/Permit Application No.:
14. Required Response Date:
15. DATA TRANSMITTED (F) (G) (H) (I)
(A) (B) Document/Drawing No. (C) (D) (E) Tite or Description of Data Transnitted Approval Reason Origi- Receiver
Item Sheet Rev. Desigrator for Trun- nslcr Disposition
No. No. No. mittl Dispo.
1 SNF-5698 N/A 0 Comparison of Calculational S 1, 2 1 1
Results from Different Spent
Nuclear Fuel Cunmbling
Approval Designator (F) Reason for Trmanmittal (G) Disposition (t) 8 (D
E, S, Q, D cr N/A I Approval 4. Review I. Approved 4 Reviewed no/comment
(see WHC-CM-35, Sec.12.7) 2. Release 5. Post-Review 2. Approved w/comnent 5. Reviewed w/comment
3. Information 6. Dis. (Receipt Ackisow. Required) 3. Duapproved w/coneusnt 6. Receipt acknowledged
(See Approval Designator for required signatures)
(G) (H) (J) Name (K) Signature (L) Date (M) MSIN (G) (H) (J) Name (K) Signature (L) Date (M) MSIN
Reason Diap. Reason DiaP
1 Design Authority wA__
Design Agent /
1 J Cog Eng. M. G. Piepho
1 / Cog. Mgr. R. L. Garrett
1 QA a/f
] Safety . R. Brehm d x
3 OpnS N_
18. 19. 20. 21. DOE APPROVAL(if required)
M. G. Piepho R. L Garrett [ 1 Approved
[ I Approved w/comments
Signature of EDT Date Authorized Representative Date Design Auth 'ty Date [ Disapproved w/comments
Originator Ifz S/O For Receiving Organiation Cognizant Manager
BD-7400-172-2 (05/96) GEF097
Here’s what’s next.
This report can be searched. Note: Results may vary based on the legibility of text within the document.
Tools / Downloads
Get a copy of this page or view the extracted text.
Citing and Sharing
Basic information for referencing this web page. We also provide extended guidance on usage rights, references, copying or embedding.
Reference the current page of this Report.
PIEPHO, M.G. Comparison of Calculational Results from Different Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF) Crumbling Approaches, report, January 25, 2000; United States. (digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc742901/m1/1/: accessed July 21, 2018), University of North Texas Libraries, Digital Library, digital.library.unt.edu; crediting UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.