Field Test Evaluation of Conservation Retrofits of Low-Income, Single-Family Buildings in Wisconsin: Audit Field Test Implementation and Results Page: 53 of 84
This report is part of the collection entitled: Office of Scientific & Technical Information Technical Reports and was provided to Digital Library by the UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.
The following text was automatically extracted from the image on this page using optical character recognition software:
Inconsistencies between measurements and predictions are fairly evenly
distributed among the houses with different major retrofits. Four (67%) of the
six wall insulation houses showed measured savings that were inconsistent with
the predicted savings, indicating a problem with the audit's predictions of wall
insulation energy savings. Three (43%) of the seven houses with no major
retrofits showed savings that were inconsistent with the predictions. Houses
receiving a condensing furnace did no better; three (43%) of the seven showed
measured savings inconsistent with the predicted savings. The audit is
apparently not accurate in predicting energy savings of individual houses.
Here’s what’s next.
This report can be searched. Note: Results may vary based on the legibility of text within the document.
Tools / Downloads
Get a copy of this page or view the extracted text.
Citing and Sharing
Basic information for referencing this web page. We also provide extended guidance on usage rights, references, copying or embedding.
Reference the current page of this Report.
McCold, L.N. Field Test Evaluation of Conservation Retrofits of Low-Income, Single-Family Buildings in Wisconsin: Audit Field Test Implementation and Results, report, January 1, 1988; United States. (digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc740901/m1/53/: accessed December 12, 2018), University of North Texas Libraries, Digital Library, digital.library.unt.edu; crediting UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.