Advanced emissions control development program: Phase 2 final report, February 29, 1996--August 31, 1997. Revision 1 Metadata

Metadata describes a digital item, providing (if known) such information as creator, publisher, contents, size, relationship to other resources, and more. Metadata may also contain "preservation" components that help us to maintain the integrity of digital files over time.

Title

  • Main Title Advanced emissions control development program: Phase 2 final report, February 29, 1996--August 31, 1997. Revision 1

Creator

  • Author: Evans, A. P.
    Creator Type: Personal
  • Author: Holmes, M. J.
    Creator Type: Personal
  • Author: Redinger, K. E.
    Creator Type: Personal

Contributor

  • Sponsor: United States. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Fossil Energy.
    Contributor Type: Organization
    Contributor Info: USDOE Assistant Secretary for Fossil Energy, Washington, DC (United States)
  • Sponsor: Ohio State Government, Columbus, OH (United States)
    Contributor Type: Organization

Publisher

  • Name: McDermott Technology Inc., Alliance, OH (United States)
    Place of Publication: United States

Date

  • Creation: 1998-04-01

Language

  • English

Description

  • Content Description: The objective of the advanced emissions control development program (AECDP) is to develop practical, cost-effective strategies for reducing the emissions of air toxics from coal-fired boilers. Ideally, the project aim is to effectively control air toxic emissions through the use of conventional flue gas cleanup equipment such as electrostatic precipitators (ESPs), fabric filters (baghouse), and wet flue gas desulfurization. Development work to date has concentrated on the capture of mercury, other trace metals [antimony, arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, lead, manganese, nickel, and selenium], fine particulate and hydrogen chloride. Some general comments that can be made about the control of air toxics while burning a high-sulfur bituminous coal are as follows: (1) particulate control devices such as ESP`s and baghouses do a good job of removing non-volatile trace metals; (2) mercury goes through particulate control devices almost entirely uncontrolled; (3) wet scrubbing can effectively remove hydrogen chloride; and (4) wet scrubbers show good potential for the removal of mercury when operated under certain conditions, however additional work is needed to understand the relationship between the wet scrubber`s operating conditions and mercury capture.
  • Physical Description: 129 p.

Subject

  • Keyword: Nitrogen Oxides
  • Keyword: Hydrochloric Acid
  • Keyword: Sulfur Dioxide
  • STI Subject Categories: 01 Coal, Lignite, And Peat
  • Keyword: Fly Ash
  • Keyword: Progress Report
  • Keyword: Mercury
  • Keyword: Air Pollution Control
  • Keyword: Experimental Data
  • Keyword: Electrostatic Precipitators
  • Keyword: Fabric Filters
  • Keyword: Scrubbers
  • Keyword: Metals
  • Keyword: Performance

Source

  • Other Information: PBD: Apr 1998

Collection

  • Name: Office of Scientific & Technical Information Technical Reports
    Code: OSTI

Institution

  • Name: UNT Libraries Government Documents Department
    Code: UNTGD

Resource Type

  • Report

Format

  • Text

Identifier

  • Other: DE98005015
  • Report No.: OCDO--98005015
  • Grant Number: FC22-94PC94251
  • DOI: 10.2172/650188
  • Office of Scientific & Technical Information Report Number: 650188
  • Archival Resource Key: ark:/67531/metadc709251

Note

  • Display Note: OSTI as DE98005015