Criteria for choosing among competing alternatives for ATBM defenses. Final report

PDF Version Also Available for Download.

Description

The Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) established an executive review panel to assess the paper written by Peter Zimmerman. The panel consisted of experts on theater missile defenses, U.S. relations with former Soviet Union/Russia, the ABM compliance issues. The panel was NOT able to reach a consensus on the issues raised by the paper. NOR was it able to validate the criteria developed therein. A majority of the panel took exception to many to the facts, findings, and conclusions of the paper. The major points under dispute are: the characterization of the threat, the definition of technical risk, ... continued below

Physical Description

Medium: P; Size: 32 p.

Creation Information

Creator: Unknown. May 1, 1995.

Context

This report is part of the collection entitled: Office of Scientific & Technical Information Technical Reports and was provided by UNT Libraries Government Documents Department to Digital Library, a digital repository hosted by the UNT Libraries. More information about this report can be viewed below.

Who

People and organizations associated with either the creation of this report or its content.

Creator

  • We've been unable to identify the creator(s) of this report.

Sponsor

Publishers

Provided By

UNT Libraries Government Documents Department

Serving as both a federal and a state depository library, the UNT Libraries Government Documents Department maintains millions of items in a variety of formats. The department is a member of the FDLP Content Partnerships Program and an Affiliated Archive of the National Archives.

Contact Us

What

Descriptive information to help identify this report. Follow the links below to find similar items on the Digital Library.

Description

The Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) established an executive review panel to assess the paper written by Peter Zimmerman. The panel consisted of experts on theater missile defenses, U.S. relations with former Soviet Union/Russia, the ABM compliance issues. The panel was NOT able to reach a consensus on the issues raised by the paper. NOR was it able to validate the criteria developed therein. A majority of the panel took exception to many to the facts, findings, and conclusions of the paper. The major points under dispute are: the characterization of the threat, the definition of technical risk, system performance requirements, limits on ATBM systems imposed by the ABM Treaty, Congressional views, cost and IOC dates. The issues are discussed in detail in this review.

Physical Description

Medium: P; Size: 32 p.

Notes

OSTI as DE95011621

Source

  • Other Information: PBD: [1995]

Language

Item Type

Identifier

Unique identifying numbers for this report in the Digital Library or other systems.

  • Other: DE95011621
  • Report No.: LA-SUB--95-14
  • Grant Number: W-7405-ENG-36
  • DOI: 10.2172/69100 | External Link
  • Office of Scientific & Technical Information Report Number: 69100
  • Archival Resource Key: ark:/67531/metadc708513

Collections

This report is part of the following collection of related materials.

Office of Scientific & Technical Information Technical Reports

Reports, articles and other documents harvested from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information.

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI) is the Department of Energy (DOE) office that collects, preserves, and disseminates DOE-sponsored research and development (R&D) results that are the outcomes of R&D projects or other funded activities at DOE labs and facilities nationwide and grantees at universities and other institutions.

What responsibilities do I have when using this report?

When

Dates and time periods associated with this report.

Creation Date

  • May 1, 1995

Added to The UNT Digital Library

  • Sept. 12, 2015, 6:31 a.m.

Description Last Updated

  • July 28, 2016, 7:10 p.m.

Usage Statistics

When was this report last used?

Yesterday: 0
Past 30 days: 1
Total Uses: 4

Interact With This Report

Here are some suggestions for what to do next.

Start Reading

PDF Version Also Available for Download.

International Image Interoperability Framework

IIF Logo

We support the IIIF Presentation API

Criteria for choosing among competing alternatives for ATBM defenses. Final report, report, May 1, 1995; New Mexico. (digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc708513/: accessed October 22, 2018), University of North Texas Libraries, Digital Library, digital.library.unt.edu; crediting UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.