Financing end-use solar technologies in a restructured electricity industry: Comparing the cost of public policies Metadata

Metadata describes a digital item, providing (if known) such information as creator, publisher, contents, size, relationship to other resources, and more. Metadata may also contain "preservation" components that help us to maintain the integrity of digital files over time.


  • Main Title Financing end-use solar technologies in a restructured electricity industry: Comparing the cost of public policies


  • Author: Jones, E.
    Creator Type: Personal
  • Author: Eto, J.
    Creator Type: Personal


  • Sponsor: United States. Department of Energy. Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.
    Contributor Type: Organization
    Contributor Info: USDOE Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Washington, DC (United States)


  • Name: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
    Place of Publication: California
    Additional Info: Lawrence Berkeley Lab., CA (United States)


  • Creation: 1997-09-01


  • English


  • Content Description: Renewable energy technologies are capital intensive. Successful public policies for promoting renewable energy must address the significant resources needed to finance them. Public policies to support financing for renewable energy technologies must pay special attention to interactions with federal, state, and local taxes. These interactions are important because they can dramatically increase or decrease the effectiveness of a policy, and they determine the total cost of a policy to society as a whole. This report describes a comparative analysis of the cost of public policies to support financing for two end-use solar technologies: residential solar domestic hot water heating (SDHW) and residential rooftop photovoltaic (PV) systems. The analysis focuses on the cost of the technologies under five different ownership and financing scenarios. Four scenarios involve leasing the technologies to homeowners in return for a payment that is determined by the financing requirements of each form of ownership. For each scenario, the authors examine nine public policies that might be used to lower the cost of these technologies: investment tax credits (federal and state), production tax credits (federal and state), production incentives, low-interest loans, grants (taxable and two types of nontaxable), direct customer payments, property and sales tax reductions, and accelerated depreciation.
  • Physical Description: 105 p.


  • Keyword: Financing
  • Keyword: Residential Buildings
  • Keyword: Capitalized Cost
  • STI Subject Categories: 29 Energy Planning And Policy
  • STI Subject Categories: 14 Solar Energy
  • Keyword: Solar Water Heating
  • Keyword: Photovoltaic Power Supplies
  • Keyword: Public Policy
  • Keyword: Comparative Evaluations


  • Other Information: PBD: Sep 1997


  • Name: Office of Scientific & Technical Information Technical Reports
    Code: OSTI


  • Name: UNT Libraries Government Documents Department
    Code: UNTGD

Resource Type

  • Report


  • Text


  • Other: DE98051517
  • Report No.: LBNL--40218
  • Grant Number: AC03-76SF00098
  • DOI: 10.2172/572745
  • Office of Scientific & Technical Information Report Number: 572745
  • Archival Resource Key: ark:/67531/metadc695609


  • Display Note: INIS; OSTI as DE98051517