Monte Carlo simulation of the R/1 automated damage test

PDF Version Also Available for Download.

Description

In this paper, a Monte Carlo computer analysis of the R/l automated damage test procedure currently in use at LLNL is presented. This study was undertaken to quantify the intrinsic sampling errors of the R/l ADT method for various types of optical materials, particularly KDP and fused silica, and to provide a recommended minimum number of test sites. A gaussian/normal distribution of 10 J/cm² average fluence ({mu}) was used as a damage distribution model. The standard deviation ({sigma}) of the distribution was varied to control its shape. Distributions were simulated which correspond to the damage distributions of KDP ({mu}/{sigma} = ... continued below

Physical Description

1.5 Mbytes

Creation Information

Runkel, M September 18, 1998.

Context

This article is part of the collection entitled: Office of Scientific & Technical Information Technical Reports and was provided by UNT Libraries Government Documents Department to Digital Library, a digital repository hosted by the UNT Libraries. More information about this article can be viewed below.

Who

People and organizations associated with either the creation of this article or its content.

Author

Publisher

Provided By

UNT Libraries Government Documents Department

Serving as both a federal and a state depository library, the UNT Libraries Government Documents Department maintains millions of items in a variety of formats. The department is a member of the FDLP Content Partnerships Program and an Affiliated Archive of the National Archives.

Contact Us

What

Descriptive information to help identify this article. Follow the links below to find similar items on the Digital Library.

Description

In this paper, a Monte Carlo computer analysis of the R/l automated damage test procedure currently in use at LLNL is presented. This study was undertaken to quantify the intrinsic sampling errors of the R/l ADT method for various types of optical materials, particularly KDP and fused silica, and to provide a recommended minimum number of test sites. A gaussian/normal distribution of 10 J/cm² average fluence ({mu}) was used as a damage distribution model. The standard deviation ({sigma}) of the distribution was varied to control its shape. Distributions were simulated which correspond to the damage distributions of KDP ({mu}/{sigma} = 5-10) and fused silica ({mu}/{sigma} - 15). A measure of the variability in test results was obtained by random sampling of these distributions and construction of the cumulative failure probability �S� curves. The random samplings were performed in runs of 100 �tests� with the number of samples (i.e. sites) per test ranging from 2 to 500. For distributions with {mu}/{sigma} = 5-10, the study found an intrinsic error of 3 to 5% in the maximum deviation from the distribution average when using 100 site tests. The computations also showed substantial variation in the form of the CFD for any given test. The simulation results were compared to actual data from eight 100 site R/l automated tests on a sample from rapidly grown KDP. It was found that while each 100 site damage probability curve could be fit to a gaussian distribution reasonably well, the 800 site cumulative damage probability curve was better modeled by a lognormal distribution. The differences observed in the individual CFD curves could be accounted for by sampling errors calculated from gaussian models.

Physical Description

1.5 Mbytes

Source

  • 30th Boulder Damage Symposium, Annual Symposium on Optical Materials for High Power Lasers, Boulder, CO, September 28-October 1, 1998

Language

Item Type

Identifier

Unique identifying numbers for this article in the Digital Library or other systems.

  • Other: DE00006188
  • Report No.: UCRL-JC-131515
  • Grant Number: W-7405-Eng-48
  • Office of Scientific & Technical Information Report Number: 6188
  • Archival Resource Key: ark:/67531/metadc695280

Collections

This article is part of the following collection of related materials.

Office of Scientific & Technical Information Technical Reports

Reports, articles and other documents harvested from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information.

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI) is the Department of Energy (DOE) office that collects, preserves, and disseminates DOE-sponsored research and development (R&D) results that are the outcomes of R&D projects or other funded activities at DOE labs and facilities nationwide and grantees at universities and other institutions.

What responsibilities do I have when using this article?

When

Dates and time periods associated with this article.

Creation Date

  • September 18, 1998

Added to The UNT Digital Library

  • Aug. 14, 2015, 8:43 a.m.

Description Last Updated

  • May 6, 2016, 10:56 p.m.

Usage Statistics

When was this article last used?

Yesterday: 0
Past 30 days: 1
Total Uses: 8

Interact With This Article

Here are some suggestions for what to do next.

Start Reading

PDF Version Also Available for Download.

Citations, Rights, Re-Use

Runkel, M. Monte Carlo simulation of the R/1 automated damage test, article, September 18, 1998; Livermore, California. (digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc695280/: accessed October 21, 2017), University of North Texas Libraries, Digital Library, digital.library.unt.edu; crediting UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.