A comparison of different texture analysis techniques

PDF Version Also Available for Download.

Description

With the advent of automated techniques for measuring individual crystallographic orientations using electron diffraction, there has been an increase in the use of local orientation measurements for measuring textures in polycrystalline materials. Several studies have focused on the number of single orientation measurements necessary to achieve the statistics of more conventional texture measurement, techniques such as pole figure measurement using x-ray and neutron diffraction. This investigation considers this question but also is extended to consider the nature of the differences between textures measured using individual orientation measurements and those measured using x-ray diffraction.

Physical Description

12 p.

Creation Information

Wright, S.I. & Kocks, U.F. August 1, 1996.

Context

This article is part of the collection entitled: Office of Scientific & Technical Information Technical Reports and was provided by UNT Libraries Government Documents Department to Digital Library, a digital repository hosted by the UNT Libraries. More information about this article can be viewed below.

Who

People and organizations associated with either the creation of this article or its content.

Authors

Sponsor

Publisher

Provided By

UNT Libraries Government Documents Department

Serving as both a federal and a state depository library, the UNT Libraries Government Documents Department maintains millions of items in a variety of formats. The department is a member of the FDLP Content Partnerships Program and an Affiliated Archive of the National Archives.

Contact Us

What

Descriptive information to help identify this article. Follow the links below to find similar items on the Digital Library.

Description

With the advent of automated techniques for measuring individual crystallographic orientations using electron diffraction, there has been an increase in the use of local orientation measurements for measuring textures in polycrystalline materials. Several studies have focused on the number of single orientation measurements necessary to achieve the statistics of more conventional texture measurement, techniques such as pole figure measurement using x-ray and neutron diffraction. This investigation considers this question but also is extended to consider the nature of the differences between textures measured using individual orientation measurements and those measured using x-ray diffraction.

Physical Description

12 p.

Notes

OSTI as DE96012160

Source

  • 11. textures of materials conference, Xian (China), 16-20 Sep 1996

Language

Item Type

Identifier

Unique identifying numbers for this article in the Digital Library or other systems.

  • Other: DE96012160
  • Report No.: LA-UR--96-1893
  • Report No.: CONF-9609220--1
  • Grant Number: W-7405-ENG-36
  • Office of Scientific & Technical Information Report Number: 379104
  • Archival Resource Key: ark:/67531/metadc686925

Collections

This article is part of the following collection of related materials.

Office of Scientific & Technical Information Technical Reports

What responsibilities do I have when using this article?

When

Dates and time periods associated with this article.

Creation Date

  • August 1, 1996

Added to The UNT Digital Library

  • July 25, 2015, 2:20 a.m.

Description Last Updated

  • Feb. 25, 2016, 2:07 p.m.

Usage Statistics

When was this article last used?

Yesterday: 0
Past 30 days: 0
Total Uses: 3

Interact With This Article

Here are some suggestions for what to do next.

Start Reading

PDF Version Also Available for Download.

Citations, Rights, Re-Use

Wright, S.I. & Kocks, U.F. A comparison of different texture analysis techniques, article, August 1, 1996; New Mexico. (digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc686925/: accessed August 16, 2017), University of North Texas Libraries, Digital Library, digital.library.unt.edu; crediting UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.