Advanced Reservoir Characterization and Evaluation of CO{sub 2} Gravity Drainage in the Naturally Fractured Spraberry Trend Area Page: 92 of 190
This report is part of the collection entitled: Office of Scientific & Technical Information Technical Reports and was provided to UNT Digital Library by the UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.
Extracted Text
The following text was automatically extracted from the image on this page using optical character recognition software:
time level. n is the old time level for which we have a complete solution and all variables and
properties. n+1 is the new time level for which the solution is unknown. With this notation,
our finite-difference approximations to the 2D spontaneous imbibition equation is
Di, 1 / 2
Di-11/2, j - Di-1/12,j - Di+1/2,j - Di 1/2 -Di,j+1/2 Di+1/2,j Swi
Di,j-1/2
Shx h [ n+1 n(13
D112,j and D i+12,]j are evaluated using arithmetic averaging as below
D i-1/2, j = 2ij + D -, ............................................( 4
Di + Di+1, j
D i+1/2, j = 2 ........................................................................................(15)
Note that the relative permeabilities and capillary pressure are functions of water saturation;
thus, Eq. 13 must be solved iteratively. Once the new saturations are solved using the initial
guess, these new water saturations are compared with the old water saturations until
acceptance convergence has been reached.
The core plug is totally immersed in the water and therefore, boundary conditions are set to be
1-Sor. This implies that instantaneous imbibition occurs at the matrix-fracture interface. Initial
conditions are required to begin the time step sequence. In this study, initial conditions are
specified equal to initial water saturation.
2.2.6 Results and Discussions
In order to match the recovery from the imbibition experiments, only capillary pressure was
altered and other parameters were kept constant. The following relative permeability
correlations from Honarpour et al (1986) as inputs:
kro = k, (1-Sw )3 ...........................................................................................(16)
k = kr.(Sw )3..................................................(17)
For the base case, the maximum oil relative permeability (k,,,) was set to 1.0 and the
maximum water relative permeability (krw ) was set to 0.3. In these relationships, the S,* is
expressed as S.* = (Sw -Swi) .The residual oil saturation (Sor) was set to 0.5437 and
(I-Sor -Swi )
irreducible water saturation (Sw1) was set to 0.37. Those average values of Sor and Sw, values
are obtained from Table 2.2-1.72
Upcoming Pages
Here’s what’s next.
Search Inside
This report can be searched. Note: Results may vary based on the legibility of text within the document.
Tools / Downloads
Get a copy of this page or view the extracted text.
Citing and Sharing
Basic information for referencing this web page. We also provide extended guidance on usage rights, references, copying or embedding.
Reference the current page of this Report.
Schechter, D.S. Advanced Reservoir Characterization and Evaluation of CO{sub 2} Gravity Drainage in the Naturally Fractured Spraberry Trend Area, report, February 3, 1999; Tulsa, Oklahoma. (https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc676256/m1/92/: accessed April 24, 2024), University of North Texas Libraries, UNT Digital Library, https://digital.library.unt.edu; crediting UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.