Hydrodynamic models for slurry bubble column reactors. Third technical progress report, January 1995--March 1995 Page: 1 of 20
This report is part of the collection entitled: Office of Scientific & Technical Information Technical Reports and was provided to Digital Library by the UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.
The following text was automatically extracted from the image on this page using optical character recognition software:
THIRD TECHNICAL PROGRESS REPORT
HYDRODYNAMIC MODELS FOR SLURRY BUBBLE COLUMN
U.S. Department Energy Grant
D.Gidaspow, Principal Investigator
Department of Chemical Engineering
Illinois Institute of Technology
Chicago, Illinois 60616
The objective of this investigation is to convert our "learning gas-solid-liquid"
fluidization model into a predictive design model. The IIT hydrodynamic model computes
the phase velocities and the volume fractions of gas, liquid and particulate phases. Model
verification involves a comparison of these computed velocities and volume fractions to
After a discussion of our research with the DOE-Air Products team in January, we
decided to concentrate on the slurry configuration of interest to DOE-Air Products which
has no recirculation of liquid. In such a system the gas is the continuous phase, rathd than,
the liquid that we had used in our model in the past. We have built such a cold fl2W twQ c-
dimensional plastic model. We have also changed our computer code. At the re ?est T
Air Products and DOE we have started a simulation of LaPorte RUN E-8.1 (1 1) fbr o-'
production of methanol as described in the Air Products report sent to us. For is61hernal n
operation, there is good mixing, and the preliminary results shown in this repordindiate ' -c
that we should obtain an agreement between the experiment and the simulatioqg A dial y
report will be prepared upon completion of the simulation. ' c--
Diana Matonis, a Ph.D. candidate supported by an IITRI fellowship, has*developed
a three dimensional version of our G-L-S code which will be used in the present study.
"U.S. DOE PATENT CLEARANCE NOT REQUIRED PRIOR TO PUBLICATION OF THIS REPORT."
This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States
Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their
employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsi-
bility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or
process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Refer-
ence herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark,
manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recom-
mendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views
and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the
United States Government or any agency thereof.
DISTRIBUTION OF THIS DOCUMENT IS UNLMITED,, 8 R
Here’s what’s next.
This report can be searched. Note: Results may vary based on the legibility of text within the document.
Tools / Downloads
Get a copy of this page or view the extracted text.
Citing and Sharing
Basic information for referencing this web page. We also provide extended guidance on usage rights, references, copying or embedding.
Reference the current page of this Report.
Gidaspow, D. Hydrodynamic models for slurry bubble column reactors. Third technical progress report, January 1995--March 1995, report, April 1, 1995; United States. (digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc667453/m1/1/: accessed May 22, 2018), University of North Texas Libraries, Digital Library, digital.library.unt.edu; crediting UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.