IPE results as compared with NUREG-1150

PDF Version Also Available for Download.

Description

In 1990, the NRC published NUREG-1150 which assessed the risks for five U.S. nuclear power plants. This paper provides a comparison of the results and perspectives obtained from the NUREG-1150 study to those obtained form the Individual Plant Examination (IPE) program. Specifically, results and perspectives on core damage frequency and containment performance are compared.

Physical Description

20 p.

Creation Information

Pratt, W.T.; Lehner, J.; Camp, A. & Chow, E. December 31, 1995.

Context

This article is part of the collection entitled: Office of Scientific & Technical Information Technical Reports and was provided by UNT Libraries Government Documents Department to Digital Library, a digital repository hosted by the UNT Libraries. It has been viewed 12 times . More information about this article can be viewed below.

Who

People and organizations associated with either the creation of this article or its content.

Authors

  • Pratt, W.T.
  • Lehner, J. Brookhaven National Lab., Upton, NY (United States)
  • Camp, A. Sandia National Lab., Albuqurque, NM (United States)
  • Chow, E. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Rockville, MD (United States)

Sponsor

Publisher

Provided By

UNT Libraries Government Documents Department

Serving as both a federal and a state depository library, the UNT Libraries Government Documents Department maintains millions of items in a variety of formats. The department is a member of the FDLP Content Partnerships Program and an Affiliated Archive of the National Archives.

Contact Us

What

Descriptive information to help identify this article. Follow the links below to find similar items on the Digital Library.

Description

In 1990, the NRC published NUREG-1150 which assessed the risks for five U.S. nuclear power plants. This paper provides a comparison of the results and perspectives obtained from the NUREG-1150 study to those obtained form the Individual Plant Examination (IPE) program. Specifically, results and perspectives on core damage frequency and containment performance are compared.

Physical Description

20 p.

Notes

INIS; OSTI as DE96011487

Source

  • 23. water reactor safety information meeting, Bethesda, MD (United States), 23-25 Oct 1995

Language

Item Type

Identifier

Unique identifying numbers for this article in the Digital Library or other systems.

  • Other: DE96011487
  • Report No.: BNL-NUREG--62801
  • Report No.: CONF-9510156--14
  • Office of Scientific & Technical Information Report Number: 243448
  • Archival Resource Key: ark:/67531/metadc666858

Collections

This article is part of the following collection of related materials.

Office of Scientific & Technical Information Technical Reports

Reports, articles and other documents harvested from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information.

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI) is the Department of Energy (DOE) office that collects, preserves, and disseminates DOE-sponsored research and development (R&D) results that are the outcomes of R&D projects or other funded activities at DOE labs and facilities nationwide and grantees at universities and other institutions.

What responsibilities do I have when using this article?

When

Dates and time periods associated with this article.

Creation Date

  • December 31, 1995

Added to The UNT Digital Library

  • June 29, 2015, 9:42 p.m.

Description Last Updated

  • April 7, 2016, 8:08 p.m.

Usage Statistics

When was this article last used?

Yesterday: 0
Past 30 days: 0
Total Uses: 12

Interact With This Article

Here are some suggestions for what to do next.

Start Reading

PDF Version Also Available for Download.

Citations, Rights, Re-Use

Pratt, W.T.; Lehner, J.; Camp, A. & Chow, E. IPE results as compared with NUREG-1150, article, December 31, 1995; Upton, New York. (digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc666858/: accessed October 19, 2017), University of North Texas Libraries, Digital Library, digital.library.unt.edu; crediting UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.