A review of the current state-of-the-art methodology for handling bias and uncertainty in performing criticality safety evaluations. Final report

Thumbnail image of item number 1 in: 'A review of the current state-of-the-art methodology for handling bias and uncertainty in performing criticality safety evaluations. Final report'.
Thumbnail image of item number 2 in: 'A review of the current state-of-the-art methodology for handling bias and uncertainty in performing criticality safety evaluations. Final report'.
Thumbnail image of item number 3 in: 'A review of the current state-of-the-art methodology for handling bias and uncertainty in performing criticality safety evaluations. Final report'.
Thumbnail image of item number 4 in: 'A review of the current state-of-the-art methodology for handling bias and uncertainty in performing criticality safety evaluations. Final report'.
Showing 1-4 of 112 pages in this report.

PDF Version Also Available for Download.

Description

The methodology for handling bias and uncertainty when calculational methods are used in criticality safety evaluations (CSE`s) is a rapidly evolving technology. The changes in the methodology are driven by a number of factors. One factor responsible for changes in the methodology for handling bias and uncertainty in CSE`s within the overview of the US Department of Energy (DOE) is a shift in the overview function from a ``site`` perception to a more uniform or ``national`` perception. Other causes for change or improvement in the methodology for handling calculational bias and uncertainty are; (1) an increased demand for benchmark criticals ... continued below

Physical Description

101 p.

Creation Information

Disney, R.K. October 1, 1994.

Context

This report is part of the collection entitled: Office of Scientific & Technical Information Technical Reports and was provided by UNT Libraries Government Documents Department to Digital Library, a digital repository hosted by the UNT Libraries. It has been viewed 19 times . More information about this report can be viewed below.

Who

People and organizations associated with either the creation of this report or its content.

Author

Sponsor

Publisher

Provided By

UNT Libraries Government Documents Department

Serving as both a federal and a state depository library, the UNT Libraries Government Documents Department maintains millions of items in a variety of formats. The department is a member of the FDLP Content Partnerships Program and an Affiliated Archive of the National Archives.

About | Browse this Partner

Contact Us

Corrections Questions

What

Descriptive information to help identify this report. Follow the links below to find similar items on the Digital Library.

Description

The methodology for handling bias and uncertainty when calculational methods are used in criticality safety evaluations (CSE`s) is a rapidly evolving technology. The changes in the methodology are driven by a number of factors. One factor responsible for changes in the methodology for handling bias and uncertainty in CSE`s within the overview of the US Department of Energy (DOE) is a shift in the overview function from a ``site`` perception to a more uniform or ``national`` perception. Other causes for change or improvement in the methodology for handling calculational bias and uncertainty are; (1) an increased demand for benchmark criticals data to expand the area (range) of applicability of existing data, (2) a demand for new data to supplement existing benchmark criticals data, (3) the increased reliance on (or need for) computational benchmarks which supplement (or replace) experimental measurements in critical assemblies, and (4) an increased demand for benchmark data applicable to the expanded range of conditions and configurations encountered in DOE site restoration and remediation.

Physical Description

101 p.

Notes

INIS; OSTI as DE96002933

Source

  • Other Information: PBD: Oct 1994

Language

Item Type

Identifier

Unique identifying numbers for this report in the Digital Library or other systems.

  • Other: DE96002933
  • Report No.: INEL--94/0251
  • Grant Number: AC07-94ID13223
  • DOI: 10.2172/148677 | External Link
  • Office of Scientific & Technical Information Report Number: 148677
  • Archival Resource Key: ark:/67531/metadc624823

Collections

This report is part of the following collection of related materials.

Office of Scientific & Technical Information Technical Reports

Reports, articles and other documents harvested from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information.

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI) is the Department of Energy (DOE) office that collects, preserves, and disseminates DOE-sponsored research and development (R&D) results that are the outcomes of R&D projects or other funded activities at DOE labs and facilities nationwide and grantees at universities and other institutions.

About | Browse this Collection

What responsibilities do I have when using this report?

Digital Files

When

Dates and time periods associated with this report.

Creation Date

  • October 1, 1994

Added to The UNT Digital Library

  • June 16, 2015, 7:43 a.m.

Description Last Updated

  • Feb. 24, 2016, 6:52 p.m.

Usage Statistics

When was this report last used?

Yesterday: 0
Past 30 days: 3
Total Uses: 19
More Statistics

Interact With This Report

Here are some suggestions for what to do next.

Start Reading

Thumbnail image of item number 1 in: 'A review of the current state-of-the-art methodology for handling bias and uncertainty in performing criticality safety evaluations. Final report'.
Thumbnail image of item number 2 in: 'A review of the current state-of-the-art methodology for handling bias and uncertainty in performing criticality safety evaluations. Final report'.
Thumbnail image of item number 3 in: 'A review of the current state-of-the-art methodology for handling bias and uncertainty in performing criticality safety evaluations. Final report'.
Thumbnail image of item number 4 in: 'A review of the current state-of-the-art methodology for handling bias and uncertainty in performing criticality safety evaluations. Final report'.

PDF Version Also Available for Download.

Citations, Rights, Re-Use

International Image Interoperability Framework

IIF Logo

We support the IIIF Presentation API

Disney, R.K. A review of the current state-of-the-art methodology for handling bias and uncertainty in performing criticality safety evaluations. Final report, report, October 1, 1994; Idaho Falls, Idaho. (digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc624823/: accessed December 14, 2018), University of North Texas Libraries, Digital Library, digital.library.unt.edu; crediting UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.