Potential impacts of 316(B) regulatory controls on economics, electricity reliability, and the environment.

Thumbnail image of item number 1 in: 'Potential impacts of 316(B) regulatory controls on economics, electricity reliability, and the environment.'.
Thumbnail image of item number 2 in: 'Potential impacts of 316(B) regulatory controls on economics, electricity reliability, and the environment.'.
Thumbnail image of item number 3 in: 'Potential impacts of 316(B) regulatory controls on economics, electricity reliability, and the environment.'.
Thumbnail image of item number 4 in: 'Potential impacts of 316(B) regulatory controls on economics, electricity reliability, and the environment.'.
Showing 1-4 of 14 pages in this article.

PDF Version Also Available for Download.

Description

Nearly half of the US utility-owned steam electric generating capacity is cooled by once-through cooling systems. These plants withdraw cooling water primarily from surface water bodies. Section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act requires that the location, design, construction, and capacity of cooling water intake structures reflect the best technology available (BTA) for minimizing adverse environmental impacts. At present, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has not yet promulgated applicable implementing regulations governing intake structures; however, the Agency is required by a Consent Decree to develop such regulations. EPA has presented a draft tiered regulatory framework approach that, depending on ... continued below

Physical Description

14 p.

Creation Information

Veil, J. A. March 19, 1999.

Context

This article is part of the collection entitled: Office of Scientific & Technical Information Technical Reports and was provided by UNT Libraries Government Documents Department to Digital Library, a digital repository hosted by the UNT Libraries. More information about this article can be viewed below.

Who

People and organizations associated with either the creation of this article or its content.

Author

Sponsor

Publisher

Provided By

UNT Libraries Government Documents Department

Serving as both a federal and a state depository library, the UNT Libraries Government Documents Department maintains millions of items in a variety of formats. The department is a member of the FDLP Content Partnerships Program and an Affiliated Archive of the National Archives.

About | Browse this Partner

Contact Us

Corrections Questions

What

Descriptive information to help identify this article. Follow the links below to find similar items on the Digital Library.

Description

Nearly half of the US utility-owned steam electric generating capacity is cooled by once-through cooling systems. These plants withdraw cooling water primarily from surface water bodies. Section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act requires that the location, design, construction, and capacity of cooling water intake structures reflect the best technology available (BTA) for minimizing adverse environmental impacts. At present, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has not yet promulgated applicable implementing regulations governing intake structures; however, the Agency is required by a Consent Decree to develop such regulations. EPA has presented a draft tiered regulatory framework approach that, depending on site-specific factors, may impose various regulatory burdens on affected utilities. Potential new requirements could range from compiling and submitting existing data to demonstrate that existing conditions at each unit represent BTA to retrofitting plants with closed-cycle cooling systems (primarily cooling towers). If the final regulations require installation of cooling towers or implementation of other costly plant modifications, utilities may elect to close some generating units rather than invest the finds necessary to upgrade them to meet the Section 316(b) requirements. Potentially, some regions of the country may then have a higher proportion of closed units than others, leading to a concern over the reliability of those regions' electricity supply. If a significant number of plants convert from once-through cooling systems to cooling towers, the environment will face secondary adverse impacts, such as additional fuel usage, air emissions, and water evaporation, and utilities will need to construct additional generating capacity. This paper describes a study that Argonne National Laboratory will conduct for the US Department of Energy to explore some of the potential outcomes of EPA's Section 316(b) regulatory process and their impact on economics, electricity supply reliability, and the environment.

Physical Description

14 p.

Notes

OSTI as DE00012360

Medium: P; Size: 14 pages

Source

  • Power Generation Impacts on Aquatic Resources Conference, Atlanta, GA (US), 04/12/1999--04/15/1999

Language

Item Type

Identifier

Unique identifying numbers for this article in the Digital Library or other systems.

  • Report No.: ANL/EA/CP-98623
  • Grant Number: W-31109-ENG-38
  • Office of Scientific & Technical Information Report Number: 12360
  • Archival Resource Key: ark:/67531/metadc620772

Collections

This article is part of the following collection of related materials.

Office of Scientific & Technical Information Technical Reports

Reports, articles and other documents harvested from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information.

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI) is the Department of Energy (DOE) office that collects, preserves, and disseminates DOE-sponsored research and development (R&D) results that are the outcomes of R&D projects or other funded activities at DOE labs and facilities nationwide and grantees at universities and other institutions.

About | Browse this Collection

What responsibilities do I have when using this article?

Digital Files

When

Dates and time periods associated with this article.

Creation Date

  • March 19, 1999

Added to The UNT Digital Library

  • June 16, 2015, 7:43 a.m.

Description Last Updated

  • April 7, 2017, 2:37 p.m.

Usage Statistics

When was this article last used?

Yesterday: 0
Past 30 days: 0
Total Uses: 2
More Statistics

Interact With This Article

Here are some suggestions for what to do next.

Start Reading

Thumbnail image of item number 1 in: 'Potential impacts of 316(B) regulatory controls on economics, electricity reliability, and the environment.'.
Thumbnail image of item number 2 in: 'Potential impacts of 316(B) regulatory controls on economics, electricity reliability, and the environment.'.
Thumbnail image of item number 3 in: 'Potential impacts of 316(B) regulatory controls on economics, electricity reliability, and the environment.'.
Thumbnail image of item number 4 in: 'Potential impacts of 316(B) regulatory controls on economics, electricity reliability, and the environment.'.

PDF Version Also Available for Download.

Citations, Rights, Re-Use

International Image Interoperability Framework

IIF Logo

We support the IIIF Presentation API

Veil, J. A. Potential impacts of 316(B) regulatory controls on economics, electricity reliability, and the environment., article, March 19, 1999; Illinois. (digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc620772/: accessed September 21, 2018), University of North Texas Libraries, Digital Library, digital.library.unt.edu; crediting UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.