Human Rights and the Strategic Use of US Foreign Food Aid Page: I
The following text was automatically extracted from the image on this page using optical character recognition software:
Fariss, Christopher J., Human Rights and the Strategic Use of US Foreign Food
Aid. Master of Science (Political Science), December 2007, 83 pp., 6 tables, 2 figures,
references, 106 titles.
How does respect for human rights affect the disbursement of food aid by US
foreign policymakers? Scholars analyzing foreign aid generally look at only total
economic aid, military aid or a combination of both. However, for a more nuanced
understanding of human rights as a determinant of foreign aid, the discrete foreign aid
programs must be examined. By disentangling component-programs from total aid,
this analysis demonstrates how human rights influence policymakers by allowing them
to distribute food aid to human rights abusing countries. Consequently, policymakers
can promote strategic objectives with food aid, while legally restricted from distributing
other aid. The primary theoretical argument, which links increasing human rights abuse
with increasing food aid, is supported by results from a Heckman model. This
procedure models the two-stage decision-making process where foreign policymakers
first, select countries for aid and then, distribute aid to those selected.
Here’s what’s next.
This thesis can be searched. Note: Results may vary based on the legibility of text within the document.
Tools / Downloads
Get a copy of this page or view the extracted text.
Citing and Sharing
Basic information for referencing this web page. We also provide extended guidance on usage rights, references, copying or embedding.
Reference the current page of this Thesis.
Fariss, Christopher J. Human Rights and the Strategic Use of US Foreign Food Aid, thesis, December 2007; Denton, Texas. (digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc5184/m1/2/: accessed January 21, 2019), University of North Texas Libraries, Digital Library, digital.library.unt.edu; .