Negotiating Environmental Relationships: Why Language Matters to Environmental Philosophy

PDF Version Also Available for Download.

Description

The medium of language is important to environmental philosophy, and more specifically, to the establishment and understanding of environmental relationships. The differences between animal and human language point to our unique semantic range, which results from our neuro-linguistic process of signification. An examination of the linguistic implications of the problem of nature and the tenets of semiotics challenges the idea of a clean word to world fit. Because signs are the medium in which meaning is constructed, questions about nature must in part be questions of language. Environmental discourse itself is bound up in sociolinguistic productions and we must attend ... continued below

Creation Information

Martin, Vernon J. December 2003.

Context

This thesis is part of the collection entitled: UNT Theses and Dissertations and was provided by UNT Libraries to Digital Library, a digital repository hosted by the UNT Libraries. It has been viewed 294 times . More information about this thesis can be viewed below.

Who

People and organizations associated with either the creation of this thesis or its content.

Publisher

Rights Holder

For guidance see Citations, Rights, Re-Use.

  • Martin, Vernon J.

Provided By

UNT Libraries

With locations on the Denton campus of the University of North Texas and one in Dallas, UNT Libraries serves the school and the community by providing access to physical and online collections; The Portal to Texas History and UNT Digital Libraries; academic research, and much, much more.

Contact Us

What

Descriptive information to help identify this thesis. Follow the links below to find similar items on the Digital Library.

Degree Information

Description

The medium of language is important to environmental philosophy, and more specifically, to the establishment and understanding of environmental relationships. The differences between animal and human language point to our unique semantic range, which results from our neuro-linguistic process of signification. An examination of the linguistic implications of the problem of nature and the tenets of semiotics challenges the idea of a clean word to world fit. Because signs are the medium in which meaning is constructed, questions about nature must in part be questions of language. Environmental discourse itself is bound up in sociolinguistic productions and we must attend not only to what language says, but to what it does. NEPA functions as a speech act that systematically invokes an ethical framework by which it colonizes the domain of valuation and fails to provide a genuine opportunity for non-commodity values to be expressed.

Language

Identifier

Unique identifying numbers for this thesis in the Digital Library or other systems.

Collections

This thesis is part of the following collection of related materials.

UNT Theses and Dissertations

Theses and dissertations represent a wealth of scholarly and artistic content created by masters and doctoral students in the degree-seeking process. Some ETDs in this collection are restricted to use by the UNT community.

What responsibilities do I have when using this thesis?

When

Dates and time periods associated with this thesis.

Creation Date

  • December 2003

Added to The UNT Digital Library

  • Feb. 15, 2008, 3 p.m.

Description Last Updated

  • Jan. 21, 2014, 4:02 p.m.

Usage Statistics

When was this thesis last used?

Yesterday: 0
Past 30 days: 1
Total Uses: 294

Interact With This Thesis

Here are some suggestions for what to do next.

Start Reading

PDF Version Also Available for Download.

Citations, Rights, Re-Use

Martin, Vernon J. Negotiating Environmental Relationships: Why Language Matters to Environmental Philosophy, thesis, December 2003; Denton, Texas. (digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc4409/: accessed November 24, 2017), University of North Texas Libraries, Digital Library, digital.library.unt.edu; .