The Implications of Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Medical Technology: Background Paper 2: Case Studies of Medical Technologies: Case Study 5: Periodontal Disease: Assessing the Effectiveness and Costs of the Keyes Technique

One of 20 reports in the series: The Implications of Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Medical Technology available on this site.
Thumbnail image of item number 1 in: 'The Implications of Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Medical Technology: Background Paper 2: Case Studies of Medical Technologies: Case Study 5: Periodontal Disease: Assessing the Effectiveness and Costs of the Keyes Technique'.
Thumbnail image of item number 2 in: 'The Implications of Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Medical Technology: Background Paper 2: Case Studies of Medical Technologies: Case Study 5: Periodontal Disease: Assessing the Effectiveness and Costs of the Keyes Technique'.
Thumbnail image of item number 3 in: 'The Implications of Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Medical Technology: Background Paper 2: Case Studies of Medical Technologies: Case Study 5: Periodontal Disease: Assessing the Effectiveness and Costs of the Keyes Technique'.
Thumbnail image of item number 4 in: 'The Implications of Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Medical Technology: Background Paper 2: Case Studies of Medical Technologies: Case Study 5: Periodontal Disease: Assessing the Effectiveness and Costs of the Keyes Technique'.
Showing 1-4 of 39 pages in this report.

PDF Version Also Available for Download.

Description

A report by the Office of Technology Assessment (OTA) that compares and assesses different methods of treating periodontal disease (p. 3).

Physical Description

viii, 32 p. ; 28 cm.

Creation Information

United States. Congress. Office of Technology Assessment. May 1981.

Context

This report is part of the collection entitled: Office of Technology Assessment and was provided by UNT Libraries Government Documents Department to Digital Library, a digital repository hosted by the UNT Libraries. It has been viewed 340 times , with 12 in the last month . More information about this report can be viewed below.


Mapped
Search

Who

People and organizations associated with either the creation of this report or its content.

Author

Contributing Authors

Publisher

Provided By

UNT Libraries Government Documents Department

Serving as both a federal and a state depository library, the UNT Libraries Government Documents Department maintains millions of items in a variety of formats. The department is a member of the FDLP Content Partnerships Program and an Affiliated Archive of the National Archives.

About | Browse this Partner

Contact Us

Corrections Questions

What

Descriptive information to help identify this report. Follow the links below to find similar items on the Digital Library.

Titles

Description

A report by the Office of Technology Assessment (OTA) that compares and assesses different methods of treating periodontal disease (p. 3).

Physical Description

viii, 32 p. ; 28 cm.

Notes

Original is missing pages 22-24.

Subjects

Keywords

Library of Congress Subject Headings

Language

Item Type

Collections

This report is part of the following collection of related materials.

Office of Technology Assessment

The Office of Technology Assessment (OTA) operated from 1972 to 1995, providing Congressional members and committees with analyses of the scientific and technological issues that were increasingly relevant to public policy and legislative action. This collection includes quarterly and annual reports, as well as internal OTA documents such as orientation materials. Many other interesting OTA materials are available in the OTA Legacy Collection via the CyberCemetery.

About | Browse this Collection

What responsibilities do I have when using this report?

Digital Files

When

Dates and time periods associated with this report.

Creation Date

  • May 1981

Coverage Date

Added to The UNT Digital Library

  • Aug. 20, 2011, 9:15 p.m.

Description Last Updated

  • April 1, 2016, 12:42 p.m.

Usage Statistics

When was this report last used?

Yesterday: 0
Past 30 days: 12
Total Uses: 340
More Statistics

Where

Geographical information about where this report originated or about its content.

Place Name

Publication Place

Map Information

  • map marker Automatically generated Place Name coordinates.
  • map marker Automatically generated Publication Place coordinates.
  • Repositioning map may be required for optimal printing.

Mapped Locations

Interact With This Report

Here are some suggestions for what to do next.

Start Reading

Thumbnail image of item number 1 in: 'The Implications of Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Medical Technology: Background Paper 2: Case Studies of Medical Technologies: Case Study 5: Periodontal Disease: Assessing the Effectiveness and Costs of the Keyes Technique'.
Thumbnail image of item number 2 in: 'The Implications of Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Medical Technology: Background Paper 2: Case Studies of Medical Technologies: Case Study 5: Periodontal Disease: Assessing the Effectiveness and Costs of the Keyes Technique'.
Thumbnail image of item number 3 in: 'The Implications of Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Medical Technology: Background Paper 2: Case Studies of Medical Technologies: Case Study 5: Periodontal Disease: Assessing the Effectiveness and Costs of the Keyes Technique'.
Thumbnail image of item number 4 in: 'The Implications of Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Medical Technology: Background Paper 2: Case Studies of Medical Technologies: Case Study 5: Periodontal Disease: Assessing the Effectiveness and Costs of the Keyes Technique'.

PDF Version Also Available for Download.

Citations, Rights, Re-Use

United States. Congress. Office of Technology Assessment. The Implications of Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Medical Technology: Background Paper 2: Case Studies of Medical Technologies: Case Study 5: Periodontal Disease: Assessing the Effectiveness and Costs of the Keyes Technique, report, May 1981; [Washington D.C.]. (digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc39456/: accessed September 22, 2017), University of North Texas Libraries, Digital Library, digital.library.unt.edu; crediting UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.