Comparison of Cast-in-Place Concrete Versus Precast Concrete Stay-in-Place Forming Systems for Lock Wall Rehabilitation Page: 1 of 104

brightness
contrast
saturation
exposure
gamma
Applying filters

Upcoming Pages

Here’s what’s next.

upcoming item: 2 2 of 104
upcoming item: 3 3 of 104
upcoming item: 4 4 of 104
upcoming item: 5 5 of 104

Show all pages in this report.

This report can be searched. Note: Results may vary based on the legibility of text within the document.

Tools / Downloads

Get a copy of this page or view the extracted text.

Citing and Sharing

Basic information for referencing this web page. We also provide extended guidance on usage rights, references, copying or embedding.

Reference the current page of this Report.

Miles, William R. Comparison of Cast-in-Place Concrete Versus Precast Concrete Stay-in-Place Forming Systems for Lock Wall Rehabilitation, report, October 1993; Vicksburg, Mississippi. (digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc303965/m1/1/: accessed August 21, 2018), University of North Texas Libraries, Digital Library, digital.library.unt.edu; crediting UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.

International Image Interoperability Framework (This Page)