Commuter Rail: Potential Impacts and Cost Estimates for the Cancelled Hudson River Tunnel Project Page: 3 of 29
The following text was automatically extracted from the image on this page using optical character recognition software:
Anticipated Benefits of ARC Project 7
Project Cost Estimates Increased Over Time and about Half the
Planned Funding Was from Federal Sources 15
Planning Documents Did Not Determine the Source of Funding of
Potential Cost Growth 20
Agency Comments 20
Appendix I Federal Transit Administration's New Starts Process 22
Appendix II GAO Contact and Staff Acknowledgments 24
Table 1: Selected Cost Estimates for the ARC Project, 2006-2010 15
Table 2: Proposed Funding by Source, as of April 2010 19
Figure 1: Route of Proposed ARC Project, NJT Lines and Major
Highways, 2009 5
Figure 2: Selected Long-term Environmental Effects of ARC
Figure 3: Relationship of Estimated Cost and Uncertainty During
Project Planning and Implementation 17
GAO-12-344 Commuter Rail
Here’s what’s next.
This report can be searched. Note: Results may vary based on the legibility of text within the document.
Tools / Downloads
Get a copy of this page or view the extracted text.
Citing and Sharing
Basic information for referencing this web page. We also provide extended guidance on usage rights, references, copying or embedding.
Reference the current page of this Report.
United States. Government Accountability Office. Commuter Rail: Potential Impacts and Cost Estimates for the Cancelled Hudson River Tunnel Project, report, March 9, 2012; Washington D.C.. (digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc300095/m1/3/: accessed October 17, 2018), University of North Texas Libraries, Digital Library, digital.library.unt.edu; crediting UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.