Grants Management: Enhancing Performance Accountability Provisions Could Lead to Better Results Page: 3 of 52
The following text was automatically extracted from the image on this page using optical character recognition software:
Results in Brief
Trade-offs and Challenges Exist in Ensuring Performance
Accountability in Federal Grants
Accountability Mechanisms Can Improve Performance and
Strategies Support Successful Selection, Design, and
Implementation of Performance Accountability Mechanisms
Various Opportunities Exist at the Federal Level to Enhance
Performance Accountability in Grants
Recommendation for Executive Action
Appendix I Objectives, Scope, and Methodology 42
Appendix II GAO Contact and Staff Acknowledgments 44
Table 1: Examples of Accountability Provisions 16
Table 2: Sources and Types of Authorization and Guidance for
Performance Accountability Mechanisms 20
Table 3: Examples of Ways to Tailor Performance Measures and
Figure 1: Accountability Provisions Can Be Used at Different
Points in the Grant Life Cycle by Various Users 18
GAO-06-1046 Grants Management
Here’s what’s next.
This report can be searched. Note: Results may vary based on the legibility of text within the document.
Tools / Downloads
Get a copy of this page or view the extracted text.
Citing and Sharing
Basic information for referencing this web page. We also provide extended guidance on usage rights, references, copying or embedding.
Reference the current page of this Report.
United States. Government Accountability Office. Grants Management: Enhancing Performance Accountability Provisions Could Lead to Better Results, report, September 29, 2006; Washington D.C.. (digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc296525/m1/3/: accessed February 17, 2019), University of North Texas Libraries, Digital Library, digital.library.unt.edu; crediting UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.