Tennessee Valley Authority: Debt Reduction Efforts and Potential Stranded Costs Page: 4 of 70
The following text was automatically extracted from the image on this page using optical character recognition software:
Figure 9: Ratio of Accumulated Depreciation/Amortization to
Gross PP&E for TVA and Likely Competitors as of Fiscal
Years 1994 and 1999
Figure 10: TVA's Potential Application of the FERC Methodology
for Calculating Stranded Costs
Figure 11: The Link Between TVA's Debt Reduction Efforts and Its
Potential Stranded Costs
Congressional Budget Office
construction work in progress
Edison Electric Institute
Energy Information Administration
Energy Policy Act of 1992
Financial Accounting Standards Board
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
property, plant, and equipment
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
Tennessee Valley Authority
GAO-01-327 Tennessee Valley Authority
Here’s what’s next.
This report can be searched. Note: Results may vary based on the legibility of text within the document.
Tools / Downloads
Get a copy of this page or view the extracted text.
Citing and Sharing
Basic information for referencing this web page. We also provide extended guidance on usage rights, references, copying or embedding.
Reference the current page of this Report.
United States. General Accounting Office. Tennessee Valley Authority: Debt Reduction Efforts and Potential Stranded Costs, report, February 28, 2001; Washington D.C.. (digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc293431/m1/4/: accessed October 21, 2018), University of North Texas Libraries, Digital Library, digital.library.unt.edu; crediting UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.