Fetzer's E-mails Concerning NAS Oceana: 4 August - 12 August 2005 Page: 2 of 150

                                
Fetzer, William, CIV, WSO-BRAC
From:                Fetzer, William,. CIV, WSO-BRAC
Sent:                Thursday, August 04, 2005 6:39 PM
To:                 'Daniel McCarthy'
Cc:                  Hanna, James, CIV, WSO-BRAC
Subject:             RE: Cecil Edit-Cost Estimates
Thanks, Dan Can you provide the square feet for each hangar on the list?
What will be the cost to buy the land back from FL and also to relocate the current
tenants that are inside the fenceline?
Also note that the VR squadron is desired (by the Navy) at the MJB.
Bill
-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel McCarthy [mailto:DanielM@coj.net]
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 5:01 PM
To: william.fetzer@wso.whs.mil
Subject: Fwd: Cecil Edit-Cost Estimates
Bill---Here is the cost estimate from Andy with his notes and explanations...I will be
forwarding more info tomorrow---dan
>>> Andy Eckert 08/04/05 4:03 PM >>>
Dan :
Attached are my editorial remarks on your initial draft. Also attached is a spreadsheet
on the requirements for hangars comparison to Oceana-Cecil. It appears Cecil (28)
actually has 3 added hangar equivalent spaces more than Oceana (25), and more of the
required support facilities on the flightline than I had previously estimated,.
In addition, Bill Fetzer indicated that the minimum hangar equivalent spaces was 21 for
2010, which means we are far ahead of that.
The spreadsheet provides a full detail estimate of the build out to replace what we had,
and I added $25 million for AIMD renovation/eqpt, trainer facilities eqpt, and other new
equipment that may not be able to be relocated from Oceana (high SWAG just to make sure we
account for the equipment that would not be included in the SF construction costs.
At the bottom of the spreadsheet I included 2 hangars at a total cost of $40 million. I
only added those in the event someone ask us to build new hangars rather than used the
older ones. No need to use that, just wanted to still show we're under $300 million with
everything. Another thing to remember is that the 4 hangar equivalent spaces I show for
Hangar 815 is actually based on the original SF of the hangar. With Flightstar, the
hangar doubled in size which means you could fit another
2-4 sqdns into the spaces.
For the C-9 (replacement will be 7373). Those sqdns need to go to NAS Jax, not Cecil.
They are at Oceana now ; however it is the VR sqdn that has its equivalent at NAS Jax
already. The hangar costs of $20 million may be applied to that if we need to.
Andy

303