Candidate Recommendation IND #0127B - Attachment to March 10 Infrastructure Executive Council Meeting Page: 4 of 118
The following text was automatically extracted from the image on this page using optical character recognition software:
Draft Deliberative Document for Discussion Purposes Only - Do Not Release Under FOIA
Potential or Competing Recommendations: None
Force Structure Capabilities: This candidate recommendation when augmented
with additional core Combat Vehicle capability at Anniston and Letterkenny
supports the Services certified force structure workload and core projections
provided to the subgroup. The force structure workload adjustments reviewed by
this subgroup considered future and legacy systems to ensure adequate capacity
was retained. Growth in the Combat Vehicle Commodity can be accommodated
with supplemental capability additions at Letterkenny and Anniston Army Depots.
Military Value Analysis Results:
Armament and Structural Components
1. Red River Army Depot, TX, 18.34
2. Hill Air Force Base, UT, 17.46
3. Marine Corps Log Base, Barstow, CA, 14.74
This component moves from Red River to Anniston. The overall effect on
average Military Value for this commodity is an increase from 16.85 to 17.46.
Although Anniston Army Depot, AL, does not currently have this capability, it
will establish any additional capabilities associated with supporting the RRAD's
Combat vehicle workload aligning to Anniston. For Anniston this is considered a
following capability and similar capabilities currently exist.
Combat Vehicles Commodity (including associated Depot Fleet and Field Support
Commodity and Fabrication and Manufacturing Commodity)
1. Anniston Army Depot, AL, 49.71
2. Marine Corps Log Base Albany, GA, 38.84
3. Red River Army Depot, TX, 38.10
4. Marine Corps Log Base Barstow, CA, 34.32
5. Rock Island Arsenal, IL, 28.06
This commodity moves from Red River (3rd of 5) to Anniston (1st of 5).
Additionally, the overall effect on average Military Value for this commodity is an
increase from 37.81 to 44.28.
Construction Equipment Commodity
1. Red River Army Depot, TX, 64.89
2. Marine Corps Log Base, Albany, GA, 55.37
3. Anniston Army Depot, AL, 51.59
Draft Deliberative Document for Discussion Purposes Only - Do Not Release Under
Here’s what’s next.
This text can be searched. Note: Results may vary based on the legibility of text within the document.
Tools / Downloads
Get a copy of this page or view the extracted text.
Citing and Sharing
Basic information for referencing this web page. We also provide extended guidance on usage rights, references, copying or embedding.
Reference the current page of this Text.
United States. Department of Defense. Candidate Recommendation IND #0127B - Attachment to March 10 Infrastructure Executive Council Meeting, text, August 3, 2005; (digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc19642/m1/4/: accessed December 12, 2017), University of North Texas Libraries, Digital Library, digital.library.unt.edu; crediting UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.