Report of IEG Deliberations of 22 Aril 2004 Page: 2 of 110

                                
Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only - Do Not Release Under FOIA

Subj: REPORT OF IEG DELIBERATIONS OF 22 APRIL 2004
USN; CDR Joseph E. Arleth, USN; CDR Greg Hilscher, USN; CDR
Robert E. Vincent II, JAGC, USN; LCDR Christopher T. Sosa, SC,
USN; LCDR Kristina Nielsen, CEC, USN; LCDR Kevin D. Laye, USN;
LCDR Brian D. Miller, USNR; LCDR Timothy P. Cowan, CEC, USN;
and, Capt James A. Noel, USMC.
2. As directed by the IEG at the last deliberative session, the
IAT Operations Team reconstructed the roll-up question for
scoring statement Air-31 of the Aviation Operations Function
Simulator Facilities component and presented it to the IEG for
consideration. See enclosure (1). The IEG approved the scoring
statement and roll-up question as written.
3. The IEG noted that there were no changes for the Naval
Surface/Subsurface Operations Function Military Value approach.
The IAT recommended that the Personnel Support (PS) attribute
weight for the Naval Ground Operations Function be aligned with
the weight for the Aviation Operations Function and that the PS
attribute weight as applied to Readiness be changed from 15 to
10 for the Ground Operations Function. The Operational
Infrastructure attribute weight as applied to Readiness was
changed from 20 to 25; Operational Training was changed from 40
to 35; Base Characteristics was changed from 15 to 20;
Environment and Encroachment remained 10. The IEG approved the
recommendations of the IAT. See enclosure (2).
4. These decisions completed the military value scoring plan
for the three operations functions. See enclosure (3). Members
of the IAT Operations Team, including LtCol Mark S. Murphy,
USMC; CDR Carl W. Deputy, USN; LtCol Terri E. Erdag, USMC; LtCol
Robert R. Mullins, Jr., USMCR; LCDR Brian D. Miller, USNR; and
LCDR Timothy P. Cowan, CEC, USN left the session. CAPT Nichols
and CDR Fairbairn, of the IAT Operations team remained in the
session.
5. The IEG reviewed the Military Value Analysis plan for DON
Specific Education and Training functions beginning with a
general review of the Education and Training (E&T) JCSG
functions, universe of functions, and military value scoring
plan. See enclosure (4).
a. The IEG agreed to use the E&T JCSG Military Value
scoring plan as a starting point and to tailor it for DON
specific activities.
b. The IEG approved the functional areas for Military

Value Analysis as follows:         DON Specific Professional Military
Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only - Do Not Release Under FOIA
2