Report of IEG Deliberations of 10 June 2004 Page: 3 of 58
This book is part of the collection entitled: Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission and was provided to UNT Digital Library by the UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.
Extracted Text
The following text was automatically extracted from the image on this page using optical character recognition software:
Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only - Do Not Release Under FOIA
Subj: REPORT OF IEG DELIBERATIONS OF 10 JUNE 2004
considered for each type of battalion and ground unit. LtCol
Erdag departed the deliberative session at 0954.
6. Ms. Davis used enclosure (4) to recap the IEG's prior
decision to conduct military value analysis of the
management/overhead functions performed by Regional Support
Activities (RSA). The IEG approved the IAT's recommendation to
add six Naval Reserve Recruiting Areas and Commander, Naval
Reserve Forces Command to the Regional Support Activities
universe. Additionally, the IEG reconsidered its 27 May 2004
decision and determined that the five Fleet and Industrial
Supply Centers (FISCs) should be included within the RSA
universe. Accordingly, the RSA universe will include 82 naval
activities that currently operate on a regional basis. See
slide (3) of enclosure (4).
7. The IEG approved the IAT's recommendation to place the RSA
activities into four categories. Category A contains the 12
Navy Installation Management Regions. Category B contains large
service providers with a large civilian staff that provide
direct support to customers. The FISCs would fall within this
category. Category C contains middle management activities.
These activities have a small staff mostly comprised of military
personnel. Category D contains administrative service
providers. These activities have limited direct contact with
their customers. Ms. Davis noted that location is not a major
concern for the activities in category D.
8. The IAT provided the IEG with four military value scoring
plan methodologies. See Slide (4) of enclosure (4). The IEG
determined that the second option was the most appropriate
method. Accordingly, the IAT was directed to develop a broadly
based scoring plan, which will enable the IEG to score the
military value questions separately for each of the four RSA
categories.
9. The IAT provided the IEG a list of four proposed attributes
and accompanying components, scoring statements, and roll-up
questions for RSAs. See slide (5) of enclosure (4) and
enclosure (5). The IEG decided to review the proposed
attributes, components, scoring statements, and roll-up
questions and provide guidance to the IAT at a future
deliberative session.
10. Ms. Davis and CDR Deputy used enclosure (6) to provide aninitial capacity analysis briefing for Aviation Operations. The
Aviation Operations capacity analysis is based upon a hangar
Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only - Do Not Release Under FOIA
3
Upcoming Pages
Here’s what’s next.
Search Inside
This book can be searched. Note: Results may vary based on the legibility of text within the document.
Tools / Downloads
Get a copy of this page or view the extracted text.
Citing and Sharing
Basic information for referencing this web page. We also provide extended guidance on usage rights, references, copying or embedding.
Reference the current page of this Book.
United States. Department of Defense. Report of IEG Deliberations of 10 June 2004, book, July 26, 2005; (https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc18674/m1/3/: accessed April 25, 2024), University of North Texas Libraries, UNT Digital Library, https://digital.library.unt.edu; crediting UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.