Letters From Individuals Concerning New London Submarine Base Page: 1 of 7
The following text was automatically extracted from the image on this page using optical character recognition software:
Commercial & Investment Real Estate
July 11, 2005 JUL 1 9 2005
General James T. Hill, USA (Ret)
2005 Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission (BRAC)
2521 South Clark Street
Arlington, Virginia 22202
Dear General Hill,
Please find below reasons why I urge you to take the New London Sub Base off the Base
The Far East is the current hot spot in the world. Why close a submarine base that can
easily access both the Atlantic and the Pacific Oceans and has a faster route to the Far
East than either Norfolk or King's Bay? Doesn't this versatility constitute significant
military value? Also, remember the lesson we learned on December 7, 1941 at Pearl
Harbor - painful.
The New London Sub Base should not be closed.
Thank you in advance for your immediate attention to this important issue.
711 Broad Street Extension, Waterford, CT 06385
(860) 447-9570 Fax: (860) 444-6661
Here’s what’s next.
This letter can be searched. Note: Results may vary based on the legibility of text within the document.
Tools / Downloads
Get a copy of this page or view the extracted text.
Citing and Sharing
Basic information for referencing this web page. We also provide extended guidance on usage rights, references, copying or embedding.
Reference the current page of this Letter.
Letters From Individuals Concerning New London Submarine Base, letter, July 21, 2005; (digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc18279/m1/1/: accessed July 18, 2018), University of North Texas Libraries, Digital Library, digital.library.unt.edu; crediting UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.