Developing indicators of the impact of scholarly communication is a massive technical challenge - but it's also much simpler than that

PDF Version Also Available for Download.

Description

Article on developing indicators of the impact of scholarly communication and the technical challenges.

Physical Description

4 p.

Creation Information

Holbrook, J. Britt June 12, 2013.

Context

This article is part of the collection entitled: UNT Scholarly Works and was provided by the UNT College of Arts and Sciences to the UNT Digital Library, a digital repository hosted by the UNT Libraries. It has been viewed 179 times. More information about this article can be viewed below.

Who

People and organizations associated with either the creation of this article or its content.

Author

Publisher

Provided By

UNT College of Arts and Sciences

The UNT College of Arts and Sciences educates students in traditional liberal arts, performing arts, sciences, professional, and technical academic programs. In addition to its departments, the college includes academic centers, institutes, programs, and offices providing diverse courses of study.

Contact Us

What

Descriptive information to help identify this article. Follow the links below to find similar items on the Digital Library.

Description

Article on developing indicators of the impact of scholarly communication and the technical challenges.

Physical Description

4 p.

Notes

Copyright 2013 Impact of Social Sciences. Original post: http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2013/06/12/56-indicators-of-impact/

Abstract: Conversations on impact tend to revolve around technical issue of measurement and finding appropriate metrics. To widen the conversation J. Britt Holbrook presents a list of 56 indicators of impact developed by the Center for the Study of Interdisciplinarity to help simplify the question of impact. By moving beyond technical aspects there is a greater opportunity for academics to embrace and explore other facets of impact.

Source

  • Impact of Social Sciences blog, 2013, London: London School of Economics and Political Science. Public Policy Group

Language

Item Type

Identifier

Unique identifying numbers for this article in the Digital Library or other systems.

Collections

This article is part of the following collection of related materials.

UNT Scholarly Works

Materials from the UNT community's research, creative, and scholarly activities and UNT's Open Access Repository. Access to some items in this collection may be restricted.

What responsibilities do I have when using this article?

When

Dates and time periods associated with this article.

Creation Date

  • June 12, 2013

Added to The UNT Digital Library

  • June 28, 2013, 2:11 p.m.

Description Last Updated

  • Dec. 4, 2023, 12:23 p.m.

Usage Statistics

When was this article last used?

Yesterday: 0
Past 30 days: 0
Total Uses: 179

Interact With This Article

Here are some suggestions for what to do next.

Start Reading

PDF Version Also Available for Download.

International Image Interoperability Framework

IIF Logo

We support the IIIF Presentation API

Holbrook, J. Britt. Developing indicators of the impact of scholarly communication is a massive technical challenge - but it's also much simpler than that, article, June 12, 2013; [London, United Kingdom]. (https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc172364/: accessed December 13, 2024), University of North Texas Libraries, UNT Digital Library, https://digital.library.unt.edu; crediting UNT College of Arts and Sciences.

Back to Top of Screen