2005 Report to the Base Closure and Realignment Commission: Air Force Justification Book Page: 2 of 21
This book is part of the collection entitled: Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission and was provided to UNT Digital Library by the UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.
Extracted Text
The following text was automatically extracted from the image on this page using optical character recognition software:
Airlift
Current / Contingency,
Condition of Cost of Ops /
Rank Base Airlift Future Mobilization,
Infrastructure Manpower
Mission Future Forces
Carswell ARS, NAS Fort
53 50.57 53.62 50.3 32.08 72.7
Worth Joint Reserve
54 Grand Forks AFB 50.53 35.28 62.52 63.66 79.09
55 Rickenbacker IAP AGS 50.04 45.27 61.23 20.26 71.11
56 Hickam AFB 49.77 34.58 66.93 60.5 1.12
57 Andersen AFB 49.64 30.79 70.34 62.87 0
58 Dannelly Field AGS 49.46 69.74 31.75 20.6 85.51
59 Randolph AFB 49.2 43.66 51.76 56.76 78.51
60 McGee Tyson APT AGS 48.32 47.96 51.87 25.79 86.02
61 Homestead ARS 48.15 37.64 59.36 48.73 53.65
62 Phoenix Sky Harbor IAP 48.12 53.14 45.21 32.12 68.42
AGS
63 Memphis IAP AGS 48.01 50.94 45.72 37.17 75.57
64 Will Rogers World APT 47.79 56.31 37.47 42.22 84.8
AGS
65 Lackland AFB 47.44 45.03 44.29 63.85 78.33
66 Boise Air Terminal AGS 47.32 46.89 46.65 44.25 78.4
67 Selfridge ANGB 47.27 44.66 52.56 38.56 42.51
68 Offutt AFB 47.07 43.55 49.1 48.25 73.2
69 Keesler AFB 46.8 64.62 29.62 26.47 85.3
Pease International Trade
70 46.65 43.72 52.48 39.09 33.8
Port AGS
71 Dobbins ARB 46.5 51.35 44.38 27.71 67.58
72 Laughlin AFB 46.13 46.75 39.38 61.81 84.09
73 Indian Springs AFS 45.8 60.77 31.08 38.5 43.94
74 Jacksonville IAP AGS 45.79 53.89 38.47 30.75 77.87
75 Stewart IAP AGS 45.53 45.03 49.72 40.99 3.65
76 Cannon AFB 45.43 45.45 43.94 44.4 73.61
77 Savannah IAP AGS 45.1 52.68 38.84 26.3 84.65
78 Pittsburgh IAP AGS 44.85 36.28 55.13 35.53 69.3
79 Louisville IAP AGS 44.66 49.33 41.32 28.67 78.1
80 Scott AFB 44.55 39.62 52.04 33.65 53.95
81 Vandenberg AFB 44.16 40.15 43.97 66.26 32.48
82 Jackson IAP AGS 44.15 47.37 39.33 39.24 84.66
83 Salt Lake City IAP AGS 43.99 45.47 43.47 32.41 71.72
84 Bangor IAP AGS 43.83 43.24 42.24 48.22 63.61
85 Vance AFB 43.45 55.12 32.89 22.51 87.75
86 Tulsa IAP AGS 43.2 49.4 38.74 23.72 81.03
87 Lincoln MAP AGS 43.08 45.83 42.39 26.26 71.2
88 Harrisburg IAP AGS 42.89 47.01 44.21 11.84 69.5
89 Richmond IAP AGS 42.64 53.44 35.69 13.67 75.18
90 FortSmithRegional 42.58 52.08 31.91 31.62 88.84
APT AGS
91 Portland IAP AGS 42.32 46.23 37.58 39.48 60.13
91 Fort Wayne IAP AGS 42.32 48.09 39.65 17.72 79.17
93 Burlington IAP AGS 42.29 51.69 34.88 26 57.07
94 Patrick AFB 42.23 47 32.91 52.75 66.83
95 Gen Mitchell IAP AGS 41.98 40.89 43.76 35.25 59.38DCN: 605
96 ]Tucson IAP AGS 41.92 45.19 39.16 30.57 72.7
Draft Deliberative -- For Discussion Purposes Only
Do Not Release Under FOIA
Upcoming Pages
Here’s what’s next.
Search Inside
This book can be searched. Note: Results may vary based on the legibility of text within the document.
Tools / Downloads
Get a copy of this page or view the extracted text.
Citing and Sharing
Basic information for referencing this web page. We also provide extended guidance on usage rights, references, copying or embedding.
Reference the current page of this Book.
United States. Department of Defense. 2005 Report to the Base Closure and Realignment Commission: Air Force Justification Book, book, June 2, 2005; (https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc14324/m1/2/: accessed April 24, 2024), University of North Texas Libraries, UNT Digital Library, https://digital.library.unt.edu; crediting UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.