2005 Report to the Base Closure and Realignment Commission: Air Force Justification Book Page: 2 of 2
This book is part of the collection entitled: Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission and was provided to UNT Digital Library by the UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.
Extracted Text
The following text was automatically extracted from the image on this page using optical character recognition software:
DRAFT DELIBERATIVE DOCUMENT--FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY DCN: 399
NOT RELEASABLE UNDER FOIA
period in the Mt. Home, Idaho Metropolitan Statistical economic area, which is 0.45
percent of economic area employment.
Assuming no economic recovery, this recommendation could result in a maximum
potential reduction of 53 jobs (30 direct jobs and 23 indirect jobs) over the 2006-2011
period in the Phoenix-Scottsdale-Mesa Metropolitan Statistical economic area, which is
less than 0.1 percent of economic area employment.
Assuming no economic recovery, this recommendation could result in a maximum
potential reduction of 31 jobs (19 direct jobs and 12 indirect jobs) over the 2006-2011
period in the Las Vegas-Paradise, Nevada Metropolitan Statistical economic area, which
is less than 0.1 percent of economic area employment. The aggregate economic impact
of all recommended actions on these economic regions of influence was considered and
is at Appendix B of Volume I.
Community Infrastructure Assessment: A review of community attributes indicates
there are no issues regarding the ability of the infrastructure of the communities to
support forces, missions, and personnel. There are no known community infrastructure
impediments to implementation of all recommendations affecting the installations in this
recommendation.
Environmental Impact: There are potential impacts to air quality; cultural,
archeological, or tribal resources; land use constraints or sensitive resource areas; noise;
threatened and endangered species or critical habitat; waste management; water
resources; and wetlands that may need to be considered during the implementation of this
recommendation. There are no anticipated impacts to dredging; or marine mammals,
resources, or sanctuaries. Impacts of costs include $958 thousand in costs for
environmental compliance and waste management. These costs were included in the
payback calculation. There are no anticipated impacts to the costs of environmental
restoration. The aggregate environmental impact of all recommended BRAC actions
affecting the installations in this recommendation have been reviewed. There are no
known environmental impediments to the implementation of this recommendation.DRAFT DELIBERATIVE DOCUMENT--FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
NOT RELEASABLE UNDER FOIA
Search Inside
This book can be searched. Note: Results may vary based on the legibility of text within the document.
Tools / Downloads
Get a copy of this page or view the extracted text.
Citing and Sharing
Basic information for referencing this web page. We also provide extended guidance on usage rights, references, copying or embedding.
Reference the current page of this Book.
United States. Department of Defense. 2005 Report to the Base Closure and Realignment Commission: Air Force Justification Book, book, June 1, 2005; (https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc14118/m1/2/: accessed March 28, 2024), University of North Texas Libraries, UNT Digital Library, https://digital.library.unt.edu; crediting UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.