The objective of this test is to operate one of the 1706-KE single pass tubes using sodium silicate rather than sodium dichromate as the corrosion inhibitor and to monitor the radioisotope concentration in the effluent. Single pass tube tests carried out under Production Test IP-484-A have demonstrated that when sodium silicate is added to process water the concentrations of significant radioisotopes in the effluent are reduced by a factor of two. At the concentrations investigated., the use of sodium silicate as an additional additive to all Hanford process water would cost in the neighborhood of two million dollars per year. …
continued below
Publisher Info:
General Electric Co., Richland, WA (United States). Hanford Atomic Products Operation
Place of Publication:
Richland, Washington
Provided By
UNT Libraries Government Documents Department
Serving as both a federal and a state depository library, the UNT Libraries Government Documents Department maintains millions of items in a variety of formats. The department is a member of the FDLP Content Partnerships Program and an Affiliated Archive of the National Archives.
Descriptive information to help identify this report.
Follow the links below to find similar items on the Digital Library.
Description
The objective of this test is to operate one of the 1706-KE single pass tubes using sodium silicate rather than sodium dichromate as the corrosion inhibitor and to monitor the radioisotope concentration in the effluent. Single pass tube tests carried out under Production Test IP-484-A have demonstrated that when sodium silicate is added to process water the concentrations of significant radioisotopes in the effluent are reduced by a factor of two. At the concentrations investigated., the use of sodium silicate as an additional additive to all Hanford process water would cost in the neighborhood of two million dollars per year. If, however, sodium silicate, an excellent corrosion inhibitor for certain applications, would also serve to replace sodium dichromate, it would provide the added benefits of eliminating Cr{sup 51} and hexavalent chromium from the effluent. While still not economically attractive, the use of sodium silicate would be less unpalatable.
Physical Description
9 p.
Notes
OSTI as DE94017244; Paper copy available at OSTI: phone, 865-576-8401, or email, reports@adonis.osti.gov
This report is part of the following collection of related materials.
Office of Scientific & Technical Information Technical Reports
Reports, articles and other documents harvested from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information.
Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI) is the Department of Energy (DOE) office that collects, preserves, and disseminates DOE-sponsored research and development (R&D) results that are the outcomes of R&D projects or other funded activities at DOE labs and facilities nationwide and grantees at universities and other institutions.
Geier, R. G. & Clinton, M. A.Production test IP-555-A sodium silicate as a corrosion inhibitor,
report,
December 17, 1962;
Richland, Washington.
(https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc1387321/:
accessed May 27, 2023),
University of North Texas Libraries, UNT Digital Library, https://digital.library.unt.edu;
crediting UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.